matticus
Guru
Although denying someone elses lived and recounted experience of racism doesn't exhibit much in the way of allyship.
I'm not denying the woman's experience - I'm just saying it wasn't racism. Do you see?
Although denying someone elses lived and recounted experience of racism doesn't exhibit much in the way of allyship.
Well i'm sure you feel very big and brave for doing that - what a hero 👍🏼
Yes I do know that's what you're saying.I'm not denying the woman's experience - I'm just saying it wasn't racism. Do you see?
I don't recall saying it was 'activism' this is just a discussion forum right?Thanks!
But really, let's both keep our forum spouting of wisdom in perspective, shall we? as Barack Obama said:
"Calling people out on the internet isn't activism
Did you see how woke I was, I called you out"
However you're trying to deny the racism in a situation where it has been very clearly laid out how and why it was racist.
About as much as I do when someone asks questions more to show their own self-regarding 'eloquence' rather than to elicit an answer.
I groan and move on.
Looking her up, it does after all seem that she was relatively inexperienced, having only held her current position since September. Prior to that she was a woman of the bedchamber, making personal arrangements for the queen and answering letters. So she may well not actually have had much prior professional contact with black charity workers from Hackney.
It was racist though.
Here's a link to read for its comedy value more than anything (further down there's a link to her husband's obituary, which renders him in all his hideous glory).
View: https://twitter.com/Samfr/status/1598407634964676609?s=19
Sorry Matt, you're wrong. It's seeing skin colour and an 'exotic' name and effectively denying that this person could just be British by birth & by culture. Consider that any black person will have to withstand comments on the lines of 'go home, you don't belong here' and less polite variants. Then even when you achieve some recognition for your work, as Fulani has done, you are confronted with that same blind prejudice. No wonder she feels aggrieved. At least she's spoken out about it.Has it? All I see is a bunch of assertions that "behaviour X or words Y are racist", when in fact they do not meet any accepted definition of racism.
Of course I cannot think why anyone would choose to label an aging white associate of the royal family racist, hard to imagine that would promote any agenda, or be fuelled by pre-conceptions ... all very odd ...
"prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized"
Is a fairly standard definition of racism .
It's what Lady Hussey was doing to ms Fulani.
If you can't see that, well I'm not going to waste any further time trying to persuade you .
... real world activism to undertake >>>>>
The way you described it, made it seem as such.1. You clairvoyant then?, you have no idea what the conversation was about, but, it most definitely had nothing to do with "heritage"
If that happens to you a lot, if your "heritage" is repeatedly held against you, it's just possible that when asked, you might get annoyed. I didn't suggest that that happened in this instance, but I can see how it might get annoying if you get asked a lot.2. Was the person who is the "victim" in this thread told to do that?
I think I've mentioned before how I heard someone on the radio talking about how we have a single word, 'racism' which covers such a wide range of attitudes and behaviours that it begins to feel inadequate. All the way from unintended and unconscious microaggressions, to discrimination at work, to some very nasty situations indeed. It's all racism.