D
Deleted member 49
Guest
Is there no winky emoji missing from that ?Who said anything about gardening skills? Hadn't realised that was ever her speciality
Is there no winky emoji missing from that ?Who said anything about gardening skills? Hadn't realised that was ever her speciality
Is there no winky emoji missing from that ?
Who said anything about gardening skills? Hadn't realised that was ever her speciality
There does seem to be a picture of a pussy with ginger bits a few posts back.
The bees were even out foraging here yesterday, but theres not much in flower to reward their efforts.
Worrying times 😟
Just watching BBC News item on lack of snow in the Alps, yet another sign of Climate Change.
I am no expert in the technology, but, presumably, using energy to produce artificial snow actually helpful in the long term (or even, the short term).
The problem with artificial snow is that it only really works to supplement existing snow, otherwise it's just going to immediately melt. The ground and air needs to be cold enough to sustain it.I am no expert in the technology, but, presumably, using energy to produce artificial snow isn't actually helpful in the long term (or even, the short term).
The problem with artificial snow is that it only really works to supplement existing snow, otherwise it's just going to immediately melt. The ground and air needs to be cold enough to sustain it.
The problem with artificial snow is that it only really works to supplement existing snow, otherwise it's just going to immediately melt. The ground and air needs to be cold enough to sustain it.
I think I'd rather deal with loss of my favourite ski slope, than losing my house and hundreds of neighbours houses to flooding/sea-rise.Well the main reason that artificial snow is created in the first place is for creating ski slopes.
The ski industry by encouraging flying and high energy use at its resorts has contributed to its own downfall.
Morally 'satisfying' perhaps, but the consequences of climate change don't discern between those who have been profligate with resources, and those living with less impact.
Quite the reverse sadly, those living relatively modestly in the global south are already suffering the worst consequences.
I think I'd rather deal with loss of my favourite ski slope, than losing my house and hundreds of neighbours houses to flooding/sea-rise.
Maybe governments could take the lead on this? I know Rishi's doing all he can in this country.But when it comes to it, people make choices that suggest their actual priorities are elsewhere.
It's the enormity of the problem, versus what I want to do right now, and every one else is doing it and having lots of fun, so why shouldn't I anyway ??