Has anyone mentioned llamas yet?
Skeptic….Oh the old story about the excessive number of alpacas being kept in the home counties where their ridiculously long necks were interfering with the flight paths of bees .??
I though that one had been debunked.
I doubt that more IQ tests will tell us much useful about advocates of these theories.Yup sorry..
.. perhaps further studies are needed
Traditional windmills have much larger blades but spin at a slower speed, they don't produce low noise which endangers humans, sea and wildlife.
there are many many names for it. but you could be correct.I expect you are talking about Infrasound.
Google ''infrasound weapons'' first result '' Infrasonic weapons like the long range acoustic device (LRAD) rely on loud, low frequency sounds (infrasound). These bulky units have been used for crowd control and repelling pirates. When on high power, the effects are like a “punch in the guts”, ranging from nausea to involuntary evacuation of the bowels. '' full article: https://theconversation.com/sonic-a...the long,involuntary evacuation of the bowels.1) Infrasound has never found be detrimental to human health unless so loud that noise of any frequency would be detrimental at this volume.
While that is true, it does'nt disregard concerns about windparcs becuase appliances etc. in an household can be switched of, something you can't say of an windpark.2) Windmills product low volumes of infrasound. We get more exposure from a whole host of everyday natural and man-made things that are higher volumes than wind turbines.
You mean the one's that allowed to windmill lobby to write the end result with them? kind of obvious they came the the conclusion everything was fine. Not to say that every publication/research/''facebook'' expertThe whole infrasound / windmill thing is pseudo-science BS peddled by people who don't like wind turbines for some reason. Look at the multiple scientific publications into it.
That's a bit of a weak one to be honest, no one is denying that, except for Shell and the likes maybe.Meanwhile, or course fossil fuel extraction and use has no environmental impact... oh wait...
there are many many names for it. but you could be correct.
Google ''infrasound weapons'' first result '' Infrasonic weapons like the long range acoustic device (LRAD) rely on loud, low frequency sounds (infrasound). These bulky units have been used for crowd control and repelling pirates. When on high power, the effects are like a “punch in the guts”, ranging from nausea to involuntary evacuation of the bowels. '' full article: https://theconversation.com/sonic-attacks-in-china-and-cuba-how-sound-can-be-a-weapon-97380#:~:text=Infrasonic weapons like the long,involuntary evacuation of the bowels.
Now i known that talks about weapons, but it uses intrasound to cause damage, which is something else then ''never detrimental to human health'' mind you that i also spoke about wildlife and the possible effect these noises can have on them.
While that is true, it does'nt disregard concerns about windparcs becuase appliances etc. in an household can be switched of, something you can't say of an windpark.
You mean the one's that allowed to windmill lobby to write the end result with them? kind of obvious they came the the conclusion everything was fine. Not to say that every publication/research/''facebook'' expert
That's a bit of a weak one to be honest, no one is denying that, except for Shell and the likes maybe.
there are many many names for it. but you could be correct.
Google ''infrasound weapons'' first result '' Infrasonic weapons like the long range acoustic device (LRAD) rely on loud, low frequency sounds (infrasound). These bulky units have been used for crowd control and repelling pirates. When on high power, the effects are like a “punch in the guts”, ranging from nausea to involuntary evacuation of the bowels. '' full article: https://theconversation.com/sonic-attacks-in-china-and-cuba-how-sound-can-be-a-weapon-97380#:~:text=Infrasonic weapons like the long,involuntary evacuation of the bowels.
Now i known that talks about weapons, but it uses intrasound to cause damage, which is something else then ''never detrimental to human health'' mind you that i also spoke about wildlife and the possible effect these noises can have on them.
While that is true, it does'nt disregard concerns about windparcs becuase appliances etc. in an household can be switched of, something you can't say of an windpark.
You mean the one's that allowed to windmill lobby to write the end result with them? kind of obvious they came the the conclusion everything was fine. Not to say that every publication/research/''facebook'' expert
That's a bit of a weak one to be honest, no one is denying that, except for Shell and the likes maybe.
This documentary exposes the myth of quiet windmills and also shows them to be dangerous, particularly in the hands of drunken yokels.
Ah, I remember that episode - "Windy Miller gets farked up on homemade grog".
It was a classic.
We send activists to prison meanwhile Range Rover mum gets a meet and greet gIg....
View: https://twitter.com/NewsForAllUK/status/1461401118722961421?t=uGFVXjtuyBCiLkj28yx2hQ&s=19
Allowing someone to use a two ton vehicle as a weapon is unacceptable- there are other roads, there are other ways of getting from A to B... someone should have a quiet word with her before she does something worse. Mind you she is a great advert for what is wrong with the 'me-me-me' world, while presenting the unattractive face of consumerism of the Chelsea tractor lifestyle.Maybe the "Activists" will be "celebrities" on their release?
Even, a new TV series: "I am a Climate Celebrity, unglue me"
It certainly is a screwed up world we live in.
Maybe the "Activists" will be "celebrities" on their release?
Even, a new TV series: "I am a Climate Celebrity, unglue me"
It certainly is a screwed up world we live in.