A
albion
Guest
Very likely he was not guilty. Even the prosecutors said that.
A swift bullet to the head would seem more humane to me.
Oh they aren't. Utah used firing squad in 2010. Idaho, Mississippi, Oklahoma and South Carolina have all passed legislation to authorise firing squads once the lethal injection supplies dried up.I find it extremely ironic that in the USA - where guns are common in some areas - they are against using a firing squad to execute people
Those of us who work in the Criminal Justice and have experience of people being wrongly convicted ( sometimes later rectified) would not support the death penalty as it is irreversible.
Even so called forensic proof is not infallible.
Remember George Bulsara convicted of murder of Jill Dando on Basis of forensic evidence
Maguire 7 convicted on forensic evidence of IRA crimes
To name just two.
In relation to DNA evidence - this again is not infallible as the instance of identical DNA between members of Afro Carribean community has never been explained
This is without considering the morals or ethics - such as killing is wrong, so we will kill you. A bit like Animal Farm some are more equal than others -ie state sponsored killers are ok, but non state sponsored killers are not
I think it's more that there is no evidence to suggest that they are unique, only the finding that as yet, we haven't found two people with exactly the same fingerprints where the fingerprint evidence was essential. There is strong evidence to suggest that the incidence of two people having identical finger prints is incredibly small, but only on the basis that all the recorded fingerprints seem to be different.I am led to believe there is also some evidence to suggest that fingerprints are not necessarily unique either.
I think it's more that there is no evidence to suggest that they are unique, only the finding that as yet, we haven't found two people with exactly the same fingerprints where the fingerprint evidence was essential. There is strong evidence to suggest that the incidence of two people having identical finger prints is incredibly small, but only on the basis that all the recorded fingerprints seem to be different.
Punishment is never a deterrent. The USA has proved this.I'm against it on principle but the main argument, that it's a deterrent, doesn't seem to be the case. The biggest deterrent to any crime is increasing the likelihood of being caught and it would be better to put efforts into that.
Only at a low level. Changing a fine for stealing a loaf of bread to a five year jail sentence isn't going to stop someone stealing a loaf of bread if they are starving. Even the Saudi approach of chopping limbs off only works if the shopkeeper is minded to ensure that the thief is reported - I suspect many would just not report the theft instead or deal with it in other ways. Plus once you go down that route it ends up costing more in healthcare and inability to work.I think it's sometimes a deterrent.
No, that is a deliberate choice to die by the person commiting ''suicide by cop'' something which can be done in europe too btw.(just much harder)In a warped kind of way, the US does have firing squads - "suicide by cop".
Prison and/or death penalty is punishment it was never intended to help.Punishment is never a deterrent. The USA has proved this.
about a 3rd of prisoners really shouldn't be in prison. It isn't helping them.