Donald I, emperor of the world.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Nothing wrong with hurty words per se but hurty words that suggest murdering people in hats-I-don't-like whilst pretending to be the progressive side seems a bit odd.

If we were in Iran you'd be the guys throwing yoghurt over women who showed their hair.
 

Pblakeney

Regular
Wants violent revolution but drives a Porsche. That's so Naca it's what Co Pilot said when I asked 'Who posts on Naca?'. (Doesn't count if it's an old, cheap classic Porker of course cos they're cool).

You are about to be hoisted on your own petard. 😂
 

briantrumpet

Active Member
You are about to be hoisted on your own petard. 😂

You know you can be deported now for misquoting Shakespeare?

"Hoist with his own petard" is a phrase from a speech in William Shakespeare's play Hamlet that has become proverbial. The phrase's meaning is that a bomb-maker is blown ("hoist", the past tense of "hoise") off the ground by his own bomb ("petard"), and indicates an ironic reversal or poetic justice.[1]

In modern vernacular usage of the idiom, the preposition "with" is commonly exchanged for a different preposition, particularly "by" (i.e. "hoist by his own petard") or "on", the implication being that the bomb has rolled back and the unfortunate bomb-maker has trodden on it by accident. The latter form is recognized by many British and American English dictionaries as an interchangeable alternative. Prepositions other than "by" and the original "with" are not widely accepted and may be seen as erroneous or even nonsensical in the correct context of the phrase.
 

Xipe Totec

Something nasty in the woodshed
Nothing wrong with hurty words per se but hurty words that suggest murdering people in hats-I-don't-like whilst pretending to be the progressive side seems a bit odd.

If we were in Iran you'd be the guys throwing yoghurt over women who showed their hair.

So you read what I posted, and your understanding was that I was actually advocating shooting MAGA supporters in the head?

One of us really needs to try harder. :rolleyes:
 

Pinno718

Regular
Wants violent revolution but drives a Porsche. That's so Naca it's what Co Pilot said when I asked 'Who posts on Naca?'. (Doesn't count if it's an old, cheap classic Porker of course cos they're cool).

It is an old classic Porsche. It's a 944 that I picked up relatively cheap and spent the time since and during lockdown, restoring.

Anyway: violent resistance to the fascism, not revolution. Revolution has many involuntary casualties.

Little old woman sat on the bus having done her shopping at Walmart wearing a MAGA hat. I would feel empathy for her.
Man with jacket and embroidered Bad Boy's logo driving a pick up truck, shotgun at hand, cross hanging from the rear view mirror: not benign. Dangerous individual .
Do you see a difference? Do you think I am advocating shooting anyone in a MAGA hat?
 
Last edited:
Anyway: violent resistance to the fascism, not revolution. Revolution has many involuntary casualties. Little old woman sat on the bus having done her shopping at Walmart wearing a MAGA hat. I would feel empathy for her.
Man with jacket and embroidered Bad Boy's logo driving a pick up truck, shotgun at hand, cross hanging from the rear view mirror: not benign. Dangerous individual .
Do you see a difference? Do you think I am advocating shooting anyone in a MAGA hat?

No, I don't see a difference. I wouldn't advocate shooting people who drive certain cars, like say BMW's, or who hang religious symbols on their car, like the Muslim prayer beads you often see. It would be very, very nuts to assume that any of those things were an indication that the owner was a fascist/fanatic who (despite having done nothing but buy/wear things you don't approve of) deserved to be on the receiving end of 'violent resistance'. It's all a bit Chairman Mao to be honest.
 

briantrumpet

Active Member
While Schumer is playing nice and trying to sell his book, AOC and Sanders are starting to look as if anyone is capable of motivating a mass movement, they are. Have to admit Sanders' passion, clarity and energy are extraordinary for an 83-year old.

1742678639124.png
 

Pinno718

Regular
No, I don't see a difference. I wouldn't advocate shooting people who drive certain cars, like say BMW's, or who hang religious symbols on their car, like the Muslim prayer beads you often see. It would be very, very nuts to assume that any of those things were an indication that the owner was a fascist/fanatic who (despite having done nothing but buy/wear things you don't approve of) deserved to be on the receiving end of 'violent resistance'. It's all a bit Chairman Mao to be honest.

Sorry, I meant 'Proud boys'*. They are a far right group. I do not differentiate these people with say fundamentalist Muslim organisations or staunch Irish nationalists/republicans. I don't know what you are trying to say. You don't wear a Proud boys/Boogaloo liveried garment 'cos you got it in a charity shop.

*I can be forgiven as there are so many of these fascist groups.

https://www.splcenter.org/hate-map/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: C R

briantrumpet

Active Member
Those who think that legal resistance is possible should take their heads out of their ärses. Read and weep.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/22/white-house-paul-weiss

TL;DR, mahoosive law firm allows itself to be bullied by Trump.

Also seem to be parallels with Mussolini getting academics to sign oaths of allegiance. Once you've got the legal system and universities to bow down before a dictator, it's going to be left to people to rise up en masse. It's looking less and less likely that the midterms will provide the opportunity for 'free and fair' elections.

https://www.chronicle.com/article/what-autocrats-want-from-academics-servility (paywalled)

1742680773804.png
 

Pblakeney

Regular
Those who think that legal resistance is possible should take their heads out of their ärses. Read and weep.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/22/white-house-paul-weiss

TL;DR, mahoosive law firm allows itself to be bullied by Trump.

The price for dining at Trump's table is to do what Trump wants. What is needed is someone independent with power but Trump is giving all the power to sycophants. The writing is on the wall, if people want to look.

Probably another misquote (😉) but all it takes for evil to exist is for good men to do nothing.
 

briantrumpet

Active Member
The price for dining at Trump's table is to do what Trump wants. What is needed is someone independent with power but Trump is giving all the power to sycophants. The writing is on the wall, if people want to look.

Probably another misquote (😉) but all it takes for evil to exist is for good men to do nothing.

I don't think it's so much that as the companies being extorted into compliance: it's the mob on a national scale. "That's a nice law firm you've got there... it would be a pity if anything happened to it." They signalled that they would use every avenue to pursue vendettas against officials who had pursued legal cases against Trump: it's putting marks on their backs and horses heads under their pillows (though I might be getting my imagery a bit mixed up there).

That said, a legal company of that size and expertise should, as you suggest, have the courage and knowledge to know how to resist the extortion.
 
Top Bottom