Setting out their reasoning for the inevitable SC hearing? Thomas, Roberts and Alito are going to have get out the game of Twister anyway. Roberts in particular, when back in 1985 he argued for limiting appointments where there was no Senate confirmation.
Although with this SC the normal rules of black isn't white don't seem to apply.
Also I think this is the first of the appeals hearings against the disqualification of the regime appointed attorneys. So the judgement may have been sending a reasoning message to those appeal circuits which will hear the other appeals, in a more detailed form rather than, "The wannabe dictator can just fuck off because the appointments clause is clearly violated."