Pblakeney
Senior Member
The Supreme Court explicitly put him (as President) above the law. He could literally order troops to shoot Democrats, and if he argued that he was carrying out an official act, then that's fine. Literally.
I think about 70% of their recent judgements have been on the 'shadow docket': they just publish a judgement with no explanation and no scrutiny. The only comments have come from dissenting opinions, some of which have been justifiably excoriating, when the judgements have gone directly against the Constitution (e.g. birthright citizenship).
You'd like to think that in 4 years time (if not before) that someone could overrule that, or at least define what constitutes "an official act".
You'd like to think.