Let's be fair. Andy is quite right that Charlie Kirk is not shouting "Chink" at at audience member, he is shouting "Chenk" at his co-panelist. It's a misattribution. Everything else is entirely accurate though.So he neither said, nor meant, any one of those things.
OK.
Hatred? That wasn't my impression at all. He was, however, clearly annoyed, with good reason.For fun - take a look at his Cambridge University Debate when they open the floor. They start with a young Muslim student. He speaks to her like she is shoot on his shoe. His hatred is quite obvious.
When people with limited imagination stop thinking of lefties and righties as two amorphous but nevertheless diametrically opposed groups there might be a chance.
A recent survey found that people rarely cross the line. This is a complex graph, but informative. The two 'blocs' indicate that people who change their voting intentions largely stay within those boundaries.
View attachment 9987
Hatred? That wasn't my impression at all. He was, however, clearly annoyed, with good reason.
View: https://youtu.be/dkiM-z0Mzyg?si=dkVxbMEx2OlaoIKi&t=1671
Agreed. I don't expect you'll convince some of the people who've decided to hate him because they don't like his politics though.
I think it's objectively preferable to hate a person because of their politics than to hate people simply for existing.
Which is what Charlie Kirk did.
We obviously have a very different interpretation of what we saw in the clip. It doesn't matter how though. Somebody shot him in the neck.
He was correct in that clip, and he didn't deserve to be shot in the neck in front of his family.
That doesn't mean the rest can be forgotten though. Quicker we move on the better imo.
A recent survey found that people rarely cross the line. This is a complex graph, but informative. The two 'blocs' indicate that people who change their voting intentions largely stay within those boundaries.
View attachment 9987
Yes, indeed, explaining Britain's electoral behaviour, for 60 years, Has no-one been listening?