Free speech

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

CXRAndy

Epic Member
 

icowden

Pharaoh
Elon wants as many teens as possible on his nonce site.

Always reminds me of this:-

brass2.jpg

 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

CXRAndy

Epic Member
Why not, government secret services spying directly upon a person, accessing private information.

This hold true for any person or citizen journalists.

Unless there is clear illegal activity presented in front if a judge, no access to said person's private communications
 

TailWindHome

Senior Member
Why not, government secret services spying directly upon a person, accessing private information.

This hold true for any person or citizen journalists.

Unless there is clear illegal activity presented in front if a judge, no access to said person's private communications


Lets see
 

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgv785n23eo

The correct decision imo.

'Stephen Evans, chief executive of the National Secular Society, said after the decision: "The High Court has rightly rejected this wrongheaded attempt to introduce a blasphemy law by the back door.

"However offensive some may have found the Quran-burning protest, it was lawful.

"Criminal law protects people from harm, not from being offended.

"This judgment makes clear that it is not the state's job to police religious sensibilities. A hostile – even violent – reaction to speech cannot be allowed to determine whether that speech is criminal".'
 

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh
Non crime hate incidents scrapped.

About time. What a waste of police resources NCHI claims were. Something that started out as a well intentioned attempt at intelligence gathering to prevent crime was quickly weaponised by some to punish people who disagreed with them, usually via an online spat.

The process was the punishment and having people endure visits from the police, phones and laptops confiscated, and be under the shadow of investigation for months, was used as a way to silence others. It doesn't stop the police investigating death threats etc but hopefully it will put an end to frivolous complaints.

Screenshot_20260331_155812_Chrome.jpg
 

TailWindHome

Senior Member


There's a blatent lie in the Free Speech Union's post

Timothy didn't merely 'criticise' mass Muslim prayer in Trafalgar Square' - he called for it to "never happen again" in public spaces

Aside from the irony of the Free Speech Union siding with banning public prayer it's telling that every defense of Timothy lies about what he actually said.
 
Top Bottom