Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Do you have a link to the quote? Wanting people to not know that you were previously recorded as male isn't the same as claiming it's necessary because there have been actual threats. The first is a privacy issue, which you could argue shouldn't obscure a medics history or prevent patients from ensuring that the doctor, eg gynacologist, they have selected is of their preferred sex.
 
Last edited:

monkers

Legendary Member
Do you have a link to the quote? Wanting people to not know that you were previously recorded as male isn't the same as claiming it's necessary because there have been actual threats. The first is a privacy issue, which you could argue shouldn't obscure a medics history or prevent patients from ensuring that the doctor, eg gynacologist, they have selected is of their preferred sex.

You don't get to be an honorary member of the official body that maintains clinical standards. The GMC are capable of doing that without the assistance of bigots.

The personal privacy of each of us is protected by law. The same people who complain that they don't get to transvestigate are the same of you as complain whenever they even suspect that there is an invasion of the privacy of themselves or those in their group.

You were warned about the negative effects on human rights by supporting ultra-right wing twunts as you have done. Women are now seen in the USA as 'diversity hires', losing women's rights and being disrespected. To note that Trump calls Andrew Tate and Tommy Robinson ''friends'' comes as no surprise to me.

I remember you telling me and others on a number of occasions as one of your attack lines, ''you obviously don't care about women and girls''.
 
Last edited:
You don't get to be an honorary member of the official body that maintains clinical standards. The GMC are capable of doing that without the assistance of bigots.
The GMC standards and procedures should be open to public scrutiny the same as with any other body. It's not bigoted to want to see either the sex of your doctor or whether they have previously been suspended as unfit to practice.

The personal privacy of each of us is protected by law.
Not always it isn't, nor should it be in every circumstance. In this case it looks like those who have got the GMC to change their sex marker on their records are being afforded a privacy that others aren't.

You were warned about the negative effects on human rights by supporting ultra-right wing twunts as you have done. Women are now seen in the USA as 'diversity hires', losing women's rights and being disrespected. To note that Trump calls Andrew Tate and Tommy Robinson ''friends'' comes as no surprise to me.

Perfectly possible to agree with people on one matter and disagree on another. What you demand is that women ignore the continuing loss of their own rights in order to keep in power a Democratic Party that has shown no respect for them.
 

monkers

Legendary Member
The GMC standards and procedures should be open to public scrutiny the same as with any other body. It's not bigoted to want to see either the sex of your doctor or whether they have previously been suspended as unfit to practice.


Not always it isn't, nor should it be in every circumstance. In this case it looks like those who have got the GMC to change their sex marker on their records are being afforded a privacy that others aren't.



Perfectly possible to agree with people on one matter and disagree on another. What you demand is that women ignore the continuing loss of their own rights in order to keep in power a Democratic Party that has shown no respect for them.

Loads more defence of bigotry using whataboutery.

Your groupings have damaged women's rights in a very obvious way in the USA. You've already wrecked trans rights, but just continue.

You want for British women what American women are now facing? Of course you do. And that's how I know you are consumed by bigotry.
 

multitool

Pharaoh
Do you have a link to the quote? Wanting people to not know that you were previously recorded as male isn't the same as claiming it's necessary because there have been actual threats. The first is a privacy issue, which you could argue shouldn't obscure a medics history or prevent patients from ensuring that the doctor, eg gynacologist, they have selected is of their preferred sex.

I read it in an msn news report. I'm sure you can Google it for yourself
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
More of a concern, woke captured club, protecting it's own weirdos



If a person working in the medical sector, studied biology to some basic level, who then cannot differentiate between what is male or female in their own body, should not be allowed to be near patients.

Is Captured Club like Culture Club, only even more fabulous?

Sign me up babes!
 
I read it in an msn news report. I'm sure you can Google it for yourself

I couldn't find it. Post your link. It's quite an allegation to say certain doctors need their past suspensions concealed because threats have been made against them.

Your groupings have damaged women's rights in a very obvious way in the USA. You've already wrecked trans rights, but just continue.
You want for British women what American women are now facing? Of course you do. And that's how I know you are consumed by bigotry.

You sought to make supporting their own erasure in law a requirement for women to have other rights like abortion. Guess what? A lot of women said No Thanks to the blackmail and left the Left. You thought women could be bullied and guilted into submission and it backfired, leaving an open goal.

Screenshot_20250221_130403_Chrome.jpg
 

monkers

Legendary Member
I couldn't find it. Post your link. It's quite an allegation to say certain doctors need their past suspensions concealed because threats have been made against them.



You sought to make supporting their own erasure in law a requirement for women to have other rights like abortion. Guess what? A lot of women said No Thanks to the blackmail and left the Left. You thought women could be bullied and guilted into submission and it backfired, leaving an open goal.

View attachment 7377


The lie here depends on that word ''contingent''. Trans rights were established. Successive governments failed to provide the resources to make the legally established system work. So the elastic stretched and then yielded. Bigots have used that as an excuse to build a well-resourced campaign against trans people. A campaign largely built on every kind of deception.

Then those campaign groups were picked up by politicians who saw the opportunity to exploit that bigotry for their own political gains. You were effectively recruited for political purposes - a useful idiot. This process worked for Brexit recruiting just enough racists to get the project over the line.

The result is that a formerly compassionate society in the UK has been sleepwalking into fascism. In the USA it has arrived. But that isn't enough for you because you think that despite privacy laws that you have such entitlement to transvestigate anyone who comes into contact with women and girls. Such a sense of entitlement is the root of the label ''Karen'' and you have those qualities in spades.
 
The result is that a formerly compassionate society in the UK has been sleepwalking into fascism.

It wasn't compassionate to women to have men in their prisons, refuges, sports, and single sex spaces. It's certainly not fascism to exclude men in certain limited circumstances. You have to frame it in this hyperbolic language in order to paint women as extremists for advocating for their own interests rather than casting them aside so the special men can get what they want.

In the USA it has arrived. But that isn't enough for you because you think that despite privacy laws that you have such entitlement to transvestigate anyone who comes into contact with women and girls. Such a sense of entitlement is the root of the label ''Karen'' and you have those qualities in spades.

Oh dear. 'Karen', the sexist name calling used as an attempt to denigrate and belittle women makes yet another appearance in your desperate posts. It's a sense of entitlement that says the rules on disclosure of suspensions mustn't be applied to a particular special subset of people.
 

monkers

Legendary Member
It wasn't compassionate to women to have men in their prisons, refuges, sports, and single sex spaces. It's certainly not fascism to exclude men in certain limited circumstances. You have to frame it in this hyperbolic language in order to paint women as extremists for advocating for their own interests rather than casting them aside so the special men can get what they want.



Oh dear. 'Karen', the sexist name calling used as an attempt to denigrate and belittle women makes yet another appearance in your desperate posts. It's a sense of entitlement that says the rules on disclosure of suspensions mustn't be applied to a particular special subset of people.

Oh shut the f.uck up ... your fascism is terminally boring, you vicious little c.unt.
 

monkers

Legendary Member
Page 1 woke, leftwing fanatics

Swear, swear, swear

Chill or you have a stroke or end up topping yourself. It's only a forum for friendly bante

Oh the knuckledragging fascist moron appears. I've never seen or heard such a ridiculous prick and poor excuse for a man. Why is it the men who boast of being 'real men' are really so brainless and feeble?

My father was a real man, gentle, kind, compassionate, selfless, generous, and talented. You don't measure as being 1% of him.
 
Top Bottom