Gender again. Sorry!

[multitool]

It's not highly charged on my part though

Actually it is, because you have spent many hours eliding trans women with rapists and sexual predators.

It's a bit like your far-right brethren who post lots and lots of photos of Muslims...but only if they are groomers, in the hope that people will make the unconscious then concious association between Muslims and groomers.

It was no surprise to me when your postings took on a distinctly anti-muslim tone, and then on Ukraine your natural inclination was not to support the invaded.

There's a reason the far-right and, as it happens, Putin's propagandists, chose transphobia as the lightning rod issue to suck people in.

You are a case study in their success.

 

[monkers]

I admire your optimism on both counts. It's not highly charged on my part though, because whatever is said on this forum it will never change material reality. I don't need to appeal to unverified sources of authority, whether relatives or claims of what my sex is, because the arguments do indeed stand on their own merit, and the more the public hear of these arguments the less convincing they seem to find them.

Have you forgotten Monkers's veiled threat to dob you in to your employer? You'd be off to a gulag in the same van as me and Andy if the opportunity arose.

View attachment 7515

shoot stirring again. Bad bot.

Noting a person's position is not a threat, veiled or otherwise.

Both Ian and N are smart enough to know that you can dob and avatar into an employer or make a legal case. You do Ian a discredit by thinking that he hasn't the brain to realise what this meant. Bad bot.

 

[monkers]

Actually it is, because you have spent many hours eliding trans women with rapists and sexual predators.

It's a bit like your far-right brethren who post lots and lots of photos of Muslims...but only if they are groomers, in the hope that people will make the unconscious then concious association between Muslims and groomers.

It was no surprise to me when your postings took on a distinctly anti-muslim tone, and then on Ukraine your natural inclination was not to support the invaded.

There's a reason the far-right and, as it happens, Putin's propagandists, chose transphobia as the lightning rod issue to suck people in.

You are a case study in their success.

And she tried on the forum to say that the woman who goaded rioteers into setting hotel on fire where they believed a certain minority group were staying, should not go to prison. She plainly doesn't understand the principles of hate speech or intent.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Actually it is, because you have spent many hours eliding trans women with rapists and sexual predators.

No, I elide them with men. That's because they are men. What you seek is to treat a subset of men differently from other men.

It was no surprise to me when your postings took on a distinctly anti-muslim tone, and then on Ukraine your natural inclination was not to support the invaded.

Citations needed for that claim. It's not anti Muslim to say that cultural factors were involved in the grooming scandals.
As to Ukraine, I've made 4 comments in 10 months on that thread none of which say I don't support Ukraine.

Usual mud slinging with no receipts.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Noting a person's position is not a threat, veiled or otherwise.

What was the purpose of noting it then?

And she tried on the forum to say that the woman who goaded rioteers into setting hotel on fire where they believed a certain minority group were staying, should not go to prison. She plainly doesn't understand the principles of hate speech or intent.

The discussion was on sentencing. No, I don't think nasty posts on Facebook deserve 2 years just as I don't think Just Stop Oil protesters deserve 5 years. Good to know you won't be complaining about the severity of sentencing for those offences in the future.

 

[monkers]

What was the purpose of noting it then?



The discussion was on sentencing. No, I don't think nasty posts on Facebook deserve 2 years just as I don't think Just Stop Oil protesters deserve 5 years. Good to know you won't be complaining about the severity of sentencing for those offences in the future.

Bad bot. Fancy stating Putin's opinion without understanding that she intended to incite others to end people's lives.

Intent is a big thing in criminal law, as is incitement. She wasn't merely a protester. You've just proved that 15 years would have been a more appropriate sentence - she got off light.

 

[AuroraSaab]

And others have done similar incitement to violence and received less punishment if any at all. Including the convicted sex offender man who shouted 'Punch terfs' to a baying crowd, who you defended on here.

You'll be pleased to know that after many months it's decided no charges will been filed against the Scottish man with the 'Decapitate Terfs' sign - which you defended as youthful exuberance if I remember rightly.

You can mud sling all you like. It's part of your toddler like extinction burst because you've lost both the public argument and managed to alienate those who did have any sympathy all in the space of a few years. And it's all thanks to people like you and how you behave. Well done.

 

[monkers]

And others have done similar incitement to violence and received less punishment if any at all. Including the convicted sex offender man who shouted 'Punch terfs' to a baying crowd, who you defended on here.

Bad bot you are making stuff up in order to incite hatred of trans people. You are worse than ChatGPT for inaccuracy.

It was intended and taken as a joke. There was no ''baying crowd, though they cheered at the joke. Nobody was punched in the face. When the police were called they said there was no crime committed. Escalation only occurred when Braverman (another know transphobic c.unt) intervened.

On the other hand the vile racist c.unt that you said should not have gone to prison, actually incited attempted mass murder. As did that c.unt Musk for that matter.

 

[monkers]

You'll be pleased to know that after many months it's decided no charges will been filed against the Scottish man with the 'Decapitate Terfs' sign - which you defended as youthful exuberance if I remember rightly.

No you don't remember correctly. You are just making stuff up. Bad Bot.

 

[multitool]

No, I elide them with men. That's because they are men. What you seek is to treat a subset of men differently from other men.



Citations needed for that claim. It's not anti Muslim to say that cultural factors were involved in the grooming scandals.
As to Ukraine, I've made 4 comments in 10 months on that thread none of which say I don't support Ukraine.

Usual mud slinging with no receipts.

The Ukraine issue has been discussed on more than one thread, and I remember well your apparent comfort with the Russo-Trumpian perspective.

Can I be arsed to go and find the posts? No, because you limit the ability to see just your posts to nake it as hard as possible for you to be held to account.

 

[classic33]

You're making my argument for me. Puberty blockers were touted as safe to use without any good quality research into long terms effects and costs vs benefits.

I'm not. It's just you seeing, and jumping on the wording you want to see thinking it's in your favour.

If you read what was said, it's about a second person, who wasn't taking the medication having to live with the side effects of the medication. Not the person taking the medication, although they are living with the effects of what was being taken at the time, albeit in a very different way. Often for them it's a life sentence. And it's certainly not what you think it is.

You do however give another perfect example of how you ignore the facts, and jump at a piece that you think is in your favour. You're also showing how stupid you are, in thinking that there's any medication on the market today, that doesn't have any side effects. Be they short or long term.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Can I be arsed to go and find the posts? No, because you limit the ability to see just your posts to nake it as hard as possible for you to be held to account.

No receipts forthcoming then, as usually.

 

[multitool]