Gender again. Sorry!

[monkers]

Biden did the same. He withheld funding for schools that would not comply with his edict that male athletes should be allowed to compete in the female category.

"States that fail to comply would risk legal action or the loss of federal education funding".

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2021/jan/22/transgender-athletes-joe-biden-executive-order

Why would a school check genitals when many alternatives - like the athlete being honest, school records, note from a doctor, or a cheek swab test - are available?

The UK Olympic rower standing up for women was Alex Storey.


View: https://x.com/GBNEWS/status/1687066967260471298

I'm not interested in Biden. This is not party politics, this is about women and girls - have you forgotten about them?

 

[AuroraSaab]

I haven't forgotten. I'm pleased that women and girls will have fairness in their sports because males with an unfair advantage will now have to compete in the appropriate category. I'm pleased that an executive order has said men can no longer be placed in Womens federal prisons in the US.

I'm disappointed it ever got to the stage of having to undo this level of state sanctioned misogyny.

 

[monkers]

I haven't forgotten. I'm pleased that women and girls will have fairness in their sports because males with an unfair advantage will now have to compete in the appropriate category. I'm pleased that an executive order has said men can no longer be placed in Womens federal prisons in the US.

I'm disappointed it ever got to the stage of having to undo this level of state sanctioned misogyny.

But indifferent to fear among girls that there exists potential for genital checks against a background the background of ''molestation'' by school staff where 50 Senators voted for a Bill where genital checks are not explicitly excluded even though these were campaigned for.

Nothing, absolutely nothing is permitted by you to get in the way of your obsession, a morbid fear of people living the same rights to a free life as you or me.

 

[AuroraSaab]

It's not a right for males to be in womens and girls spaces, sports, prisons, refuges and such. No amount of histrionics or special pleading will make it so.

 

[CXRAndy]

I'm not interested in Biden. This is not party politics, this is about women and girls - have you forgotten about them?

So when it favours trans, not concerned about girls being exposed to males in changing rooms, being disadvantaged in sports etc.

All of a sudden real girls are a concern 🤪

 

[monkers]

So when it favours trans, not concerned about girls being exposed to males in changing rooms, being disadvantaged in sports etc.

All of a sudden real girls are a concern 🤪

OK so you are happy to have teachers carry out genital checks on your kids to make sure that no trans kid beats them in the egg and spoon race. Noted.

And to make sense, which let's be fair you almost never do, there's nothing in my posts that says that I agree with males exposing themselves to girls in changing rooms. This is your pathetic invention. In fact everything about you seems pathetic.

 

[monkers]

It's not a right for males to be in womens and girls spaces, sports, prisons, refuges and such. No amount of histrionics or special pleading will make it so.

The histrionics are all your own, pressing false alarm bells all over the place. The rest of us just want to get on with life.

 

[monkers]

There was a former British Olympic male rower, who stood up publicly and said to allow males in female boats was absolutely ridiculous.

Are those boats female by biological sex or gender identity. I'm fascinated to know that boats have a sex.

 

[CXRAndy]

so you are happy to have teachers carry out genital checks on your kids to make sure that no trans kid

I'm happier that trans kids are placed in their biological category for sport and changing room

 

[monkers]

I'm happier that trans kids are placed in their biological category for sport and changing room

That's one thing, but if the price of policing this having girls becomes girls subjected to genital checks, you'll still be happy?

 

[CXRAndy]

You don't have to do it that way, obvious first, ask the parent/child their biological sex at birth. Note it down and place any child who identifies anything other than their sex in open male category. Let's face it, it's only males are causing an issue for girls and women. The problem doesn't exist the other way around

 

[CXRAndy]

Next option a simple saliva swab.

 

[icowden]

That's one thing, but if the price of policing this having girls becomes girls subjected to genital checks, you'll still be happy?

The bill states that this is not supported:

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025”.
SEC. 2. Amendment.

Section 901 of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(d) (1) It shall be a violation of subsection (a) for a recipient of Federal funds who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.

“(2) For purposes of this subsection, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.”.

 

[monkers]

“(2) For purposes of this subsection, sex shall be recognized based solely on a person's reproductive biology and genetics at birth.”.

How is this to be checked?

 

[CXRAndy]

How is this to be checked?

How about a birthday certificate or salvia swab?