Steve Davis thinks men have a fundamentally selfish approach to snooker, which women don’t have.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/snooker/27253279
I guess when men accept, they have no access to women's safe spaces and sportsAt what point is she going to stop obsessing over the queer community I wonder?
I'd put money on neither of you being able to name a single other female pool player before this final came to light.
So no brain wiring, but somehow trans woman are inherently women. Where is the inherent woman based if not in the brain?I agree with most of what he's saying, but not with the brain wiring.
The trouble with this approach is that someone (insert witty acronym for the NACA transgender sport arbitration committee) has to decide which sports males have advantage in. Then we need to work on that list of non-competitive sports where male advantage doesn't really matter - I think we have Parkrun so farPool is based on skill and focus, not strength or gender.
So no brain wiring, but somehow trans woman are inherently women. Where is the inherent woman based if not in the brain?
The trouble with this approach is that someone (insert witty acronym for the NACA transgender sport arbitration committee) has to decide which sports males have advantage in. Then we need to work on that list of non-competitive sports where male advantage doesn't really matter - I think we have Parkrun so far
You don't need to have heard of Lance Armstrong or follow cycling to know that unfair advantage is wrong. One purpose of separate competitions is to promote female participation in sports in which women have been historically underrepresented. That is undermined when men can enter.
The point is it's a competition for women so you don't need to be an expert on pool to know that these 2 men shouldn't be in it.We were talking about pool. Not cycling.
The winner, Haynes, has won nothing as a male player as far as I can see. Came straight in to the Women's comps and straight off has won lots in the last 6 years.Have you found out about either finalists' record prior to this final?
Or learned how to play pool?
The point is it's a competition for women so you don't need to be an expert on pool to know that these 2 men shouldn't be in it.
The winner, Haynes, has won nothing as a male player as far as I can see. Came straight in to the Women's comps and straight off has won lots in the last 6 years.
I know how to play pool, thanks, and have known for about 40 years. I was a member of Riley's snooker club at one point 30 years ago. Height and reach is advantageous.
As is being able to practice for eight hours a day as Reanne Evans says in the piece linked to.The point is it's a competition for women so you don't need to be an expert on pool to know that these 2 men shouldn't be in it.
The winner, Haynes, has won nothing as a male player as far as I can see. Came straight in to the Women's comps and straight off has won lots in the last 6 years.
I know how to play pool, thanks, and have known for about 40 years. I was a member of Riley's snooker club at one point 30 years ago. Height and reach is advantageous.
The same reason they wanted to go to what were men's schools and universities, or go into 'men's' careers. Because there was nothing similar for women, only for men, and that was because they were excluded from them because they were women.Tell me, why did women demand to be allowed to play in what was the mens championship?
Women wanted, and got, their own championship. Separate still from the mens championship.The same reason they wanted to go to what were men's schools and universities, or go into 'men's' careers. Because there was nothing similar for women, only for men, and that was because they were excluded from them because they were women.
Funny how they knew who to exclude when it suited them to exclude women.