Gender again. Sorry!
- Thread starter theclaud
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
monkers
Squire
Told you, Monkers subdivides the trans until the data is meaningless or suits her narrative
The law does moron. People are the sex it says on their birth certificate. I'm subdividing those people who are men and those people who are women. It's exactly the same as what you've been saying you want.
And that's it.
Even the fake data sheet shows 103 women in prison for sexual offences. It shows 11 660 men in prison for sexual offences. It shows 92 men who think of themselves as having some female tendencies based on which box they ticked. It shows them all segregated by sex. The number of men in prison for sexual offences in 2023 is 11660 + 92 = 11 752.
There are more women in prison than men who have ticked a box.
But most of all, even the fake data does not show trans women with a GRC in prison in England or Wales for sexual assaults against women, let alone in a women's toilet.
The Supreme Court judgment relates only to trans people with a GRC and not those without.
If that's what we are discussing, then all of this nonsense is irrelevant, because we don't know from any data if there are any trans women with a GRC in prison for committing crimes against a woman in a women's space. The greatest probability is that there are none, unless you can drag up a single case by scraping the internet.
Together you are sounding victorious and celebrating a great victory. The accompanying data does not show that women have been made safer.
If anybody thinks that a sign on a door will keep out a man determined to assault a woman, they need to get tested. In this respect nothing will change.
The number of trans women assaulted in men's toilets will probably rocket. Already masculine presenting lesbians are being directed to men's toilets despite the guidance not even being in place.
This is exactly what I have been predicting would happen in this situation.
Last edited:
monkers
Squire
I almost agree. Women need safe spaces from the people that we know assault them. It's just that women with a GRC are not in that cohort.
monkers
Squire
Explains why you haven't got any.
monkers
Squire
No fruitloops, trans women with a GRC get to count as women - and not ''apparently'', that remains the law. The Supreme Court have not undone the GRA. What they have done is made a group of people with their sex on the birth certificates unprotected by bigots who are now declaring open season on them for discrimination.
I don't have to look for evidence of that, because that fact is being demonstrated in real time, here in the moment, by you.
AuroraSaab
Shaman
No, I didn't. There were 3 at one point.
There were 3 in 2021 when the self ID re jails fuss kicked off.
One was a sex offender with 10 counts of child sex abuse. Not on hrt, had no surgery. Jailed in 2019. Cannot be named because of the children.
https://www.lawsociety.ie/gazette/t...ransgender-inmate-housed-with-women-prisoners
One was Bruno Binda De Souza, caught with child abuse photos and videos. Was eventually moved to a men's jail because paperwork said male. Wasn't deported on release.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland...with-depraved-child-abuse-images-1101788.html
The other was your favourite, Barbie Kharsdashian. Now in a men's unit because too dangerous for the women's.
There's since been Shauna Kavanagh who violently assaulted a homeless women. 15 previous convictions. Started in Limerick women's jail, then transferred to the Dorchas women's unit.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ir...transgender-inmate-dublin-prison-30904350.amp
So 3 at one point, in a country with a similar population to Yorkshire. That's quite an over representation, especially of sex offenders.
How many men in women's jails is too many though? I think 1 is too many.
There were 3 in 2021 when the self ID re jails fuss kicked off.
One was a sex offender with 10 counts of child sex abuse. Not on hrt, had no surgery. Jailed in 2019. Cannot be named because of the children.
https://www.lawsociety.ie/gazette/t...ransgender-inmate-housed-with-women-prisoners
One was Bruno Binda De Souza, caught with child abuse photos and videos. Was eventually moved to a men's jail because paperwork said male. Wasn't deported on release.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland...with-depraved-child-abuse-images-1101788.html
The other was your favourite, Barbie Kharsdashian. Now in a men's unit because too dangerous for the women's.
There's since been Shauna Kavanagh who violently assaulted a homeless women. 15 previous convictions. Started in Limerick women's jail, then transferred to the Dorchas women's unit.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ir...transgender-inmate-dublin-prison-30904350.amp
So 3 at one point, in a country with a similar population to Yorkshire. That's quite an over representation, especially of sex offenders.
How many men in women's jails is too many though? I think 1 is too many.
CXRAndy
Veteran
Well the highest court in the land agrees with me, so I'm smarter than I look.
We know what a woman is, me and bestie KC supreme court judges🤣
I
Xipe Totec
Something nasty in the woodshed
Keep that up, and MAGAndy's 'Classic Mini' is going to be reduced to a 'Classic Micro'. Permanently.
monkers
Squire
And the micro will still be bigger than the content of his brain by a multiplier of x to the n. (It's OK he won't understand this!)
AuroraSaab
Shaman
No, but why make it easier? And single sex spaces are about privacy and dignity not just safety.
Why? You keep telling us everybody but a few bigots accepts trans identifying men.
And if male strangers in a male toilet are dangerous, why aren't male strangers (transwomen) in a female toilet not dangerous? What makes one set of men magically safe for women when the others aren't?
Most of them seem are fine with the very occasional slip up. After all, now they get to exclude men from their meet ups and clubs without fear of being sued. Men can't be lesbians and many lesbians seem genuinely overjoyed at the court ruling which acknowledges their same sex attraction. As the court said, saying men can be women renders same sex attraction meaningless.
Even if you're a man with a GRC you aren't a lesbian and now lesbian groups don't have to treat you as though you are.
Stop this ridiculous attempt at guilt tripping that if we don't let men into jails, sports, refuges, lesbian groups, and give up our language, and let them be lesbians, then someone might give a short haired woman a funny look at the sinks ....
I don't know any women, lesbian, non conforming, or any other permutation of woman, who thinks this is an issue worth giving up our spaces for.
CXRAndy
Veteran
Now on law, there is no ambiguity. Its going to take a little while for this to sink in to those men or even companies that flout the law.
Women now have to supreme court judgement as a weapon to go after individuals and companies
I'm sure there will be enough solicitors who will take individual cases for women
classic33
Ăśber Member
Barbie Kardashian is at a known address. Having served her sentence.
Irish law says she is a woman.
And, as you pointed out before they were never in the same prison as each other. Which is what you claimed.
And, by your own count, it's two.
monkers
Squire
There were a small number of trans women housed in a separate wing on the female estate in Limerick. Not only did they not have access from their wing to the rest of the estate, but they were held in solitary isolation for 23 hours per day. So your narrative of them running around rampant in a women's prison is (as usual) a lie.
I admit I haven't kept up to date with the Irish prison situation, though I believe that Classic carefully examines this.
On the occasion that I last looked, one prisoner was a foreign national who had travelled to Ireland, was detained, and later deported. One was a trans woman who had indeed committed serious offences, quite properly was imprisoned with no access to women. There were, if my memory serves me correctly a further two (maybe three), these prisoners were being held for prostitution, which was an offence at that time, but no longer is. There was a disturbingly high number of cis women being held for prostitution. The big lie was that Limerick was a women's prison. It had been so; however it was converted. As a side note, I understand that Limerick is an awful environment for prisoners held there.
''Transing dead people''. What utter nonsense. I tend to read a fair bit about classical music as it has been a lifelong passion of mine. I came across an article about Chopin written by academics. Berlioz left a whole library of his musings, often humorous. He had worked as a music critic. He was a personal friend of Chopin who spent time in Paris. Chopin was said to have been delicate or frail, while his sometime lover Georg Sands was masculine looking wore men's trousers, shirts, jackets and shoes, drank alcohol and smoked cigars.
I mentioned this in the thread, and forever this has caused you to repeat the lie, that 'monkers transes dead people'. Still if you think that you don't use bad words that somehow you are polite in discussion. You are not. You are a lying c*nt, and you deserve my use of this most ugly and vile word. Never have I seen someone so determined to be such a bad faith actor in a discussion.
I'm going to remind the thread that your troup called Dr Litman 'a shroud waver' for speaking about her trans daughter who took her own life.
I remain absolutely appalled and absolutely disgusted by you saying this on here.
Last edited:
