Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

CXRAndy

Guru
Pull your pants up and be a big boy. You've been deceived you gullible fool.

Co pilot says...



You understand? This bollocks is all in your head. There is no evidence. The stuff that is in your head is there because you've been indoctrinated. Just as you've been indoctrinated in other ways from the ultra-right. You are useful to them precisely because you are such a moron.
No I haven't

You are the one that's been suckered into this ideology.
 
Pull your pants up and be a big boy. You've been deceived you gullible fool.

Co pilot says...



You understand? This bollocks is all in your head. There is no evidence. The stuff that is in your head is there because you've been indoctrinated. Just as you've been indoctrinated in other ways from the ultra-right. You are useful to them precisely because you are such a moron.

'They're only trans if they have a certificate'...

... said no one ever until it turned out the self identifying ones are overrepresented in the crime stats.
 

monkers

Squire
No I haven't

You are the one that's been suckered into this ideology.

Bring the evidence. Pretty much all you say is a pack of lies.

There is no evidence that trans women with a GRC commit offences against women.

You don't have to have an opinion about trans identities to see that what you claim is all lies.

You are useful to the fascists precisely because you are a knuckle-dragger.
 

monkers

Squire
'They're only trans if they have a certificate'...

... said no one ever until it turned out the self identifying ones are overrepresented in the crime stats.
Another of your inventions.

It was absolutely in my very first post to the forum ...post 918.

A problem word is 'transgender'. It's problematic for a number of reasons.
1 It's spelt with the 'trans' part as a prefix rather than an adjective like other trans terms.
2 If a person undergoes transition, their gender is confirmed not changed as the term implies.
3 It's an umbrella term that includes not just trans people, but transvestites, crossdressers, etc.
4 It's used in different ways in different parts of the world.
5 It lends itself to the form 'transgendered' which is in turn problematic for a number of reasons, but essentially it suggest that to be trans is to experience an enforced change by something external to the person.
 

CXRAndy

Guru
I simply split the people who are men into one group, and those who are women into another group. It was that easy.

Again you deny a TiM+C is a man.
 

classic33

Myself
If they shouldn't be counted as transwomen in the crime stats unless they have a GRC, why should they be counted as victims in the stats if they don't have a GRC? By your logic surely the only genuine victims are men with a GRC. Self ID only counts one way in your book.
A small word that always plays a big part in most of your arguments on here.

Me, I'm attempting to use your logic.
Jeez. You can't even grasp a straightforward news article.
Relying heavily on a prominent anti-trans activist and advisory group member of the leading anti-trans lobby, Prof. Alice Sullivan.
So your source material is suspect.
Nor can you grasp statistics. This is likely down to victims rightly feeling encouraged to come forward. Even with the increase the number of male sex offenders dwarfs the number of female ones.
So it excuses them, in your mind, being female they can do no wrong. And if they do, they're not as bad as men.
Where's your much vaunted dignity and safety for girls disappeared to. Doesn't it have any relevance when the perpetrator is female?
You make the claims, you can provide the evidence from my posts.
Easy enough find, and you were the one that said you've not said anything like that. If that were true, you'd be proving me wrong. But we both know you can't do that, hence the continuous calls from you to do what you're not willing to do. You're also fond of giving the same response I give you.
Good for the goose, good for the gander and all that.
It's a special kind of man who knows that 98% of sex crimes are committed by men but rather than being shocked by that statistic the first thing that comes into his head is to say that it's hateful for women to point this put.
There's that wrong figure being quoted again.
Is that the charge rate or conviction rate that you keep on quoting.

Is that another of your subsets of men?
You deny, even to yourself, that women can and are just as bad as men. But are only too ready to hide behind other peoples words, again and again. Even when you've had it pointed out they're incorrect.
 
Top Bottom