monkers
Shaman
Given that none of those things - the diagnosis, the hormones, the name change - are necessary to be regarded as transgender (except by you it seems) they are irrelevant. There's still no discernible difference between a man with those things and any other man. The level of commitment is irrelevant - their sex remains male.
Dr Upton doesn't have a GRC by the way. It's not the presence of a transwoman either, it's the presence of a male that's the issue.
Dr Upton wasn't pretending to be anyone. Her status was familiar to her colleagues. She hadn't progressed to having a GRC, but I know that you know the difficulty there - there's at least a seven year waiting list.
No evidence was presented that Beth Upton was acting anything other than professionally. It is quite wrong to suggest that she is a predator. The judge has made the call here, Peggie was harassing Upton contrary to the Equality Act.
As for the Supreme Court ruling, it was a matter of technical argument of statutory draftsmanship rather than one based on any philosophical nature of ''who or what a woman is''. The UKSC made no legal definition of sex.