Gender again. Sorry!

[CXRAndy]

​

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/14/womens-institute-groups-close-after-transgender-ban

Good, these groups are not working for women's interests, if they allow males, or TiMs to participate in their events

 

[monkers]

Good, these groups are not working for women's interests, if they allow males, or TiMs to participate in their events

Let me guess. You are delighted because you know best for women, and women are better off when controlled by the likes of you.

Somebody tell me, am I close?

 

[CXRAndy]

View attachment 13155


Let me guess. You are delighted because you know best for women, and women are better off when controlled by the likes of you.

Somebody tell me, am I close?

So you reply, telling me I'm on your naughty list

You, like me shouldn't involved in women's social events if they're only for women, which we are not

 

[mickle]

​

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/feb/14/womens-institute-groups-close-after-transgender-ban

Lol.

 

[monkers]

And Mickle added a laughing emoji, right? Because controlling women is fun, right?

 

[CXRAndy]

No control, they do their thing, no need for us blokes to get in on their party

 

[AuroraSaab]

The WI were talking about running groups that included men alongside women's groups. The groups that don't like having to exclude men could become one of those.

I find this bit hard to believe. I think it's unlikely that women are more reluctant to sit next to a woman who identifies as a man (why would she want to go to the WI if she identified as a man anyway?) than next to an actual man, even if he had a dress on.

Of course there's no mention of the women who might have left or who self-excluded because the WI decided to indulge the special subset of men.

Telling women they must include men in everything is the epitome of male control.

 

[monkers]

The WI were talking about running groups that included men alongside women's groups. The groups that don't like having to exclude men could become one of those.

I find this bit hard to believe. I think it's unlikely that women are more reluctant to sit next to a woman who identifies as a man (why would she want to go to the WI if she identified as a man anyway?) than next to an actual man, even if he had a dress on.

View attachment 13158

Of course there's no mention of the women who might have left or who self-excluded because the WI decided to indulge the special subset of men.

Telling women they must include men in everything is the epitome of male control.

The practice of truth inversion is prevalent, and unfortunately convincing to those with minds alert to content that serves to feed their power fantasies.

 

[Ianonabike]

Projection aside, yesterday's small chorus of useful idiots must have been some consolation.

 

[mickle]

View attachment 13156

And Mickle added a laughing emoji, right? Because controlling women is fun, right?

Controlling women? WTF are you on about?

 

[monkers]

Quiten down - I'm speaking with your owner.