monkers
Shaman
Who's stopping them speaking? They've got a huge article in The Guardian that gives them the floor with no dissenting comments from the women who are glad of the ruling.
As far as I know, the WI have never consulted their own members about whether they wished to allow men to be members, they railroaded it through without asking the women. So they didn't exactly 'let women speak'.
It only takes a few activists to change the direction of an organisation.
The inverted argument appears again, but this example is the perfect example of a self-defeating argument. And there are the unsubstantiated claims.
What matters is what is being said in this moment ... that WI branches are closing through collapsing membership since the trans ban. This is women voting with their feet. You just need to listen.
The argument that the WI took a few activists in the organisation is for the birds. I already pointed out the obvious. Why would trans activists get themselves to the top of the organisation and use that influence to ban trans people?
This is system collapse for your set of arguments.