Ian H
Legendary Member
At least he can't do any more harm.
Gender again. Sorry!
- Thread starter theclaud
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
At least he can't do any more harm.
newfhouse
pleb
In many cases they know they will have to put up with such nonsense as the price of enrolling their children into the best available school. That’s not really free choice and it doesn’t necessarily signal agreement.
Ian H
Legendary Member
When my kids were young there was in the town a choice of CofE or RC.
AuroraSaab
Squire
Most mainstream government funded Catholic and C of E schools are pretty benign these days in my experience. Enrollment doesn't signal agreement of course but the national curriculum and Ofsted has put paid to a lot of the bias that used to be there, which is why most atheist parents don't mind prayers during assembly and a few church trips a year.
I wouldn't object personally if faith schools were gradually phased out. I think they are a bit of a relic from when people were more religious and communities more divided. The caring ethos that they are perceived to have, and which makes them attractive to many parents, doesn't have to be anchored to religious principles.
I wouldn't object personally if faith schools were gradually phased out. I think they are a bit of a relic from when people were more religious and communities more divided. The caring ethos that they are perceived to have, and which makes them attractive to many parents, doesn't have to be anchored to religious principles.
Last edited:
OP
OP
theclaud
Reading around the chip
I wonder when it's going to dawn on Aurora [I see what you did there - Ed.] that this shit is precisely what these MFs are trying to bring back.
AuroraSaab
Squire
Women can't talk about stuff that concern them in case right wingers or religious groups latch on to the same thing is basically what you're saying. This is, as I said before, a protection racket argument and just a way of trying to get people to shut up about their concerns. Constantly trying to align gender critical feminism with the right wing is your usual smear tactics and won't wash.
multitool
Guest
Not "women". A tiny handful of extremists.
The absolute vast majority of women don't give a stuff
bobzmyunkle
Senior Member
But I bet they're glad you're here to speak for them.
OP
OP
theclaud
Reading around the chip
Mate - if you're hanging around outside libraries shouting 'paedo!' at drag performers, then you don't need me to do any aligning.
AuroraSaab
Squire
Can you point out the gender critical feminists shouting 'paedo' at people outside libraries? The vast majority of GC women are no more aligned with them than you are with the people nailing dead rats to rape crisis centre doors because they won't accept men.
https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/...-threats-over-transgender-controversy-3106045
Funny how you dislike the guilt by association and smearing when it's your political view it's aimed at though.
'If you're hanging around with terrorists you don't need me to do any aligning'.
https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/...-threats-over-transgender-controversy-3106045
Funny how you dislike the guilt by association and smearing when it's your political view it's aimed at though.
'If you're hanging around with terrorists you don't need me to do any aligning'.
Last edited:
AuroraSaab
Squire
The famous Schrodinger's feminists. On the one hand a tiny insignificant minority on the other a huge dangerous cabal funded by far right money.
multitool
Guest
Nobody has ever said "huge"
multitool
Guest
And here is Aurora's heroine, Julia Bindel, mainstreaming the notion that paedophiles are part of the rainbow LGBT+ community:
View: https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1635009104044277761?s=20
At this point, they are starting to consume themselves
View: https://twitter.com/GBNEWS/status/1635009104044277761?s=20
At this point, they are starting to consume themselves
