...if Robert Winston ...was to say, 'at the moment there is no means of one changing one's reproductive sex' then I will agree with him. I won't agree with him saying you can not change your sex, because that is a statement that is incomplete on one level and false on another.
Try and keep up, that was known three weeks ago.Bingo.
A third space that is unisex - anybody can use it. Not third class. Problem solved. Trans people have services and facilities just for them, but you seem to want to deny women the same thing.
Yes, and players and clubs have been forbidden from voicing their opinions and given a script to spout.
https://www.thesun.ie/sport/gaa-football/10514786/lgfa-document-ladies-footballers-launch/
Women's pro Danielle Loughrey has spoken out against it. 'She told Gript that there was “massive opposition” to the transgender policy across the country but that club members and players and volunteers had not been consulted and were afraid to speak out'.
https://gript.ie/ladies-football-trans-row-members-told-to-avoid-giving-opinions/
Barbie Khardashian is being moved from Limerick btw.
https://m.sundayworld.com/crime/iri...over-fears-of-attack-on-staff/a659395218.html
View attachment 3702
What other kind of meaningful definition of sex is there other than reproductive sex? We know 'lady brain' isn't a thing. Brains aren't sexed. We know secondary sexual characteristics aren't what makes you male or female because otherwise women with facial hair due to PCOS would be male and men with gynaecomastia (excess chest tissue) would be women. They aren't.
'That people exist without the capacity for reproduction...illustrates.. that reproductive sex is not binary' - the fact that infertile people exist does not disprove the binary and immutable nature of sex. Otherwise the fact that occasionally people are born without eyes would be proof that humans are not a 2 eyed species.
Daily Mail, no pay wall.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.da...inston-says-escape-genetics-trans-debate.html
Winston says: you can't change sex, your sex is in every cell of your body, it's determined by genetics, surgery is only cosmetic.
I doubt he would agree with your 'Some people are infertile therefore sex isn't binary' assertion but I suppose because he personally hasn't seen fit to address each of your individual claims on a niche cycling forum then I guess we'll never know.
I'm not sure it says that. What it has said is that rather than classifying Gender Dysphoria as "Gender identity disorder" under the Mental Health section of ICD11, they have created a new section around Conditions related to Sexual Health and introduced a code for Gender Dysphoria. It is still a diagnosable condition as it is listed in ICD11 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems). As such, it is a diagnosis and will be recorded as such on your electronic health record.You've just made a direct comparison between diagnosable mental health conditions and a condition that the WHO says is not a mental health condition and that has no means of diagnosis.
I admire your optimism about what can *actually* be done with the available software. This is broadly true in that your old record is archived. The new one will be next to empty.In terms of what you said about GPs, that wasn't correct. People who complete transition (ie have a GRC) are by default recoded. The medical records of the previous identity are archived.
Agreed. Now tell me how I can safely record it in any available electronic patient record.The GMC tells doctors they should otherwise change the record of a person's gender / sex at their request. This does not require the patient to have so much as started transition. This is not reserved for people who are trans identifying but for anyone.
Can you find a reference for that? The NHS number itself is a number. It has no significance and nothing coded into it. It's a number and has been since 1995. If this issue was pre-1995 then yes, that's possible. Post 1995 it's not.At one time the NHS numbers given to GRC holding trans people included an incorrect coding that indicated to hospitals that the patient was not a British citizen and not entitled to treatment under the NHS. This has caused absolute nightmares for some trans people and considerable embarrassment for hospital staff.
I'm not sure it says that. What it has said is that rather than classifying Gender Dysphoria as "Gender identity disorder" under the Mental Health section of ICD11, they have created a new section around Conditions related to Sexual Health and introduced a code for Gender Dysphoria. It is still a diagnosable condition as it is listed in ICD11 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems). As such, it is a diagnosis and will be recorded as such on your electronic health record.
The reason for the change doesn't appear to be based on any science (If you can find some please share) but because those diagnosed feel that it created additional stigma around the condition.
It's a very complex area. Some sources say it should be treated as homosexuality and is just the way that you are made. It is part of your personality. Others are concerned that whereas being gay does not require medical intervention, being transgender requires significant surgery and hormone treatment, and thus question whether very young people should be having permanent life-changing, irreversible body alterations that are not carried out for any other type of dysmorphia.
You'll have read that piece and noted that there are two women who murdered children currently being held in the same unit in Limerick Prison, for the same reasons as the person you've repeatedly said you're not bothered about. They are classed as too dangerous to mix with the general prison population.
The two trans women are there for their safety.
In terms of what you said about GPs, that wasn't correct. People who complete transition (ie have a GRC) are by default recoded. The medical records of the previous identity are archived.
Icowden said ... I admire your optimism about what can *actually* be done with the available software. This is broadly true in that your old record is archived. The new one will be next to empty.
The GMC tells doctors they should otherwise change the record of a person's gender / sex at their request. This does not require the patient to have so much as started transition. This is not reserved for people who are trans identifying but for anyone.
You'll remember me saying I have no knowledge of such things, and you had some exchange with my partner who does.Icowden said. Agreed. Now tell me how I can safely record it in any available electronic patient record.
She is in isolation/solitary because she is classed as a danger to staff and prisoners. The two child murders sharing the same wing are classed the same, a danger to staff and other prisoners.BK is in segregation because they themselves would be unsafe amongst the women prisoners? Yet BK is being moved because the prison officers are scared of BK? Doesn't make sense. Perhaps BK will finally get access to some psychiatric intervention in the new unit.
At one time the NHS numbers given to GRC holding trans people included an incorrect coding that indicated to hospitals that the patient was not a British citizen and not entitled to treatment under the NHS. This has caused absolute nightmares for some trans people and considerable embarrassment for hospital staff.
icowden said ... Can you find a reference for that? The NHS number itself is a number. It has no significance and nothing coded into it. It's a number and has been since 1995. If this issue was pre-1995 then yes, that's possible. Post 1995 it's not.