Men are allowed to attend. It's not just KJK meetings that 'your side' try to stop is it though? It's whenever women meet to discuss these issues, whether it's Kathleen Stock talking at a uni or people meeting to watch a film. It's all a bit ...
authoritarian.
I said it's harder to get from non English speaking countries, especially when men are recorded as women in official statistics.
This is self ID. A women's spa has to admit a male. You want self ID and an end to single sex spaces. This is the result.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost...welcome-naked-trans-clients-with-penises/amp/
Kathleen Stock complains about what happened at her university, but leaves out the stuff about her harassment of her learners, even telling them to 'fark off' and worse. She claims to be an academic philosopher; however her skills are so low that she is unable to differentiate between academic freedom and the right to freedom of expression at all, blurring the edges as she does as if they are the same thing, let alone in the context of pedagogic responsibility, and what is requried of her contract of employment. She was very unprofessional in role.
There's something you need to understand; there is no law at all in the UK about public nudity. Any person can appear naked in public. Where this happens, the police are powerless to intervene as no offence is committed, unless of course the nudity is accompanied by some other act that is troubling. Flashing for example is not naturism, and not legal because of the intention to maybe shock, or otherwise to ask sexual favours or whatever. But a naked man walking through the park is perfectly entitled to do so.
A naturist is not required to dress in front of children. There is an event 'the naked bike ride'. In 'the other place' there is a member who is known for taking part in naked cycling events.
In the context of this, trans people who are merely naked for the purpose of changing clothes, showering etc are not committing an offence. For an offence to be committed, there needs to be something sexual to be concurrently occurring. Therefore, if one wishes to avoid seeing a penis, one either has to avoid those areas where they are most likely to deal with it, or remember that under the law their have to just be bit more mature and have the facility to deal with it by looking away. There is no right to have a facility where you can expect to get naked with others present and police who may be there. There is no such women's rights - this is just a fantasy.
There are women who say they are uncomfortable undressing in front of women who look like they might be lesbians. Are we to ban lesbian women from female spaces to for the benefit of those women too?
The truth? We sometimes need to remember we are just animals ourselves. Most of us, men and women have sexual drivers - trans women undergoing hormone therapy tend to be much less so.
If I happened to be in a female changing room, let's say at the local pool, and I got an accidental glimpse of a trans woman's body, what would I do? I'd turn around to avoid their embarrassment, and keep my mouth shut, or maybe start a conversation with them with my back turned.
What would you do? No doubt you'd kick up a huge fuss, call security, demand the police be called, call it out to other women in the changing room, use your phone to get pictures for evidence, contact other anti-trans women, contact the press, post it endlessly all over cycle chat.
You are not a feminist, you're a reactionary prude.
