God, you're so pompous and arrogant lol.
And yet transwoman Karen White serves their life sentence in the male prison of Armley jail whilst actual females with similar life sentences are in the female estate. So a blanket ban isn't lawful - no-one said it was - but the risk assessment can presumably include the fact that the prisoner is male and can be excluded under the Equality Act exemptions....
The exemptions are there to be used if organisations and service providers wish. They aren't obligatory, but neither do they not exist at all as you would have us believe.
Pompous, arrogant, but you forgot superior! Please don't do that again.
No, not if they wish - I keep telling you the bar is a very high bar. As
@Bromptonaut told you earlier, and not for the first time of your hearing ...
The key words are 'proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim'.
This must come from written analysis which must be rigorous enough to be defendable in a court of law.
I have never said that the exemption don't exist at all. For fark sake stop just inventing shite.
All prisoners are subject to risk assessment - something you've argued against previously, but at last there's now some recognition from you.
The risk assessment is not a universal fit for trans prisoners; each risk assessment is on a case-by-case basis.
The Stephen Wood case was the result of failure. They've fixed the problem they claim.
