D
Deleted member 159
Guest
Didn't know that being polite had been cancelled. Sorry
They'll try calling ladies, cis-ladies next
Never be sorry for this sad lot
Didn't know that being polite had been cancelled. Sorry
They'll try calling ladies, cis-ladies next
Never be sorry for this sad lot
It makes women a subset of their own sex. They aren't. Quite rightly, nobody would accept the idea of cisblack and transblack people.
So all women are ciswomen? I'm confused. What's the point of adding CIS if it's the same as saying "women"? Just say "women".It doesn't. It really doesn't.
So all women are ciswomen? I'm confused. What's the point of adding CIS if it's the same as saying "women"? Just say "women".
It doesn't. It really doesn't.
I agree with you on rejecting those other terms. Rachel Dolezal proved what a mockery that was.
I disagree, Andy. If there are ciswomen and transwomen, that's 2 subsets of Women. If 'transwomen', why not 'transblack'? Why can't Rachel Dolezal be transblack and Michelle Obama be cisblack? That makes just as much sense as actual women being termed 'cis'.
Why? The point is that of course all women are different, but the muscle/mass ratio in men is far higher and testosterone much higher which means more aggression. This transwoman clearly should not be playing women's football, and it's absurd to argue otherwise.
It makes women a subset of their own sex. They aren't. Quite rightly, nobody would accept the idea of cisblack and transblack people.
Why? Because when you start making personal remarks about a person's family, you've probably gone too far. I'm not the voice of your conscience, but FWIW IMHO it looks skanky.
I didn't make personal remarks about a person's family. AndyRM compared his daughter to the transwoman as an example. I refuted that.
My daughter and niece are taller and stronger then their peers.
I didn't make personal remarks about a person's family. AndyRM compared his daughter to the transwoman as an example. I refuted that.