On a more serious note
The attempted acid throwing murderer has been helped by an accomplice
View: https://twitter.com/BritisherPaz49/status/1754477842862080488?t=ZXHqs766mZuHvK_DU-xt5w&s=19
Well no. There is no religious aspect. It's a bit over the top but you do have to recognise that Mridul Wadhwa took a job in a rape crisis centre for women by stating that they were a woman and not mentioning that they were a transwomen.But, oh no...it's not a cult
Well no. There is no religious aspect
Is there any evidence that any of the complainants were clients?. It's a bit over the top but you do have to recognise that Mridul Wadhwa took a job in a rape crisis centre for women by stating that they were a woman and not mentioning that they were a transwomen.
Oddly, it's thought that some women and young girls seeking the services of a rape crisis centre might be put off by the idea of it being run by a transwoman who - to some at least - may have got the job under false pretences by not mentioning their biological sex.
It isn't clear. Reading (trigger warning) Linehand's blog post on the issue, it isn't just about her being a transwoman.How long has Wadwha been living as a woman? The pictures of her are not of somebody of obviously masculine appearance.
Traditionally they do.Cults do not need a religious aspect.
No beliefs are involved and no leader is present. Your reference appears to be the very latter weakly defined version of cult. So we can agree to differ on this one.Cult is a term, in most contexts pejorative, for a relatively small group which is typically led by a charismatic and self-appointed leader, who tightly controls its members, requiring unwavering devotion to a set of beliefs and practices which are considered deviant (outside the norms of society).[1] This term is also used for a new religious movement or other social group which is defined by its unusual religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs and rituals,[2] or its common interest in a particular person, object, or goal. This sense of the term is weakly defined – having divergent definitions both in popular culture and academia – and has also been an ongoing source of contention among scholars across several fields of study.
There is some suggestion that a counsellor was constructively dismissed after a client requested to know the sex of her support worker and she told the client that the support worker was female but identified as non-binary. Wadwha also seems to have suggested that if women choose not to go to Edinburgh rape crisis centre because of its trans inclusive policy, then they are transphobic.Is there any evidence that any of the complainants were clients?
Traditionally they do.
No beliefs are involved
There is some suggestion that a counsellor was constructively dismissed after a client requested to know the sex of her support worker and she told the client that the support worker was female but identified as non-binary. Wadwha also seems to have suggested that if women choose not to go to Edinburgh rape crisis centre because of its trans inclusive policy, then they are transphobic.
To be fair, a lot of the "evidence" seems to be from the falling out between R Adams - the counsellor and Wadwha, but then Wadwha seems to be far more interested in trans inclusion than in helping women.
Aside from the fact that Wadhwa is a male and did not apparently disclose this on their application
If she has fully transitioned and has a GRC why does she need to?
So are we saying that there is a GC cult and a TransActivism cult?Are you saying that there isn't a belief system amongst the GC cultists? You are clearly mistaken. They even have mantra and a shared lexicon
Seems was used as I haven't seen the particulars of the constructive dismissal claim. However, much of Glinner's blog can be substantiated, so it does look as though there are issues here. However it isn't as simple as the posited "GC Cult shuts down rape crisis centre".A lot of "seems" going on here. "Seems" is about a given individual's perception, rather than anything rooted in fact, so we'll take that as a firm no then.