CXRAndy
Guru
When Ben Shapiro asked Caitlyn Jenner about his genetics. He replied
"Cut that out now or you will go home in an ambulance"
Whilst gripping the back of Ben Shapiro's neck
Typical male aggression in a dress
Gender again. Sorry!
- Thread starter theclaud
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
When Ben Shapiro asked Caitlyn Jenner about his genetics. He replied
"Cut that out now or you will go home in an ambulance"
Whilst gripping the back of Ben Shapiro's neck
Typical male aggression in a dress
classic33
Senior Member
And of course, just like now, you played no role whatsoever in threads becoming hysterical rants.
Wouldn't it be nice if upon sentencing, the prisoner was asked which prison they wanted to spend their sentence in.
Unfortunately it doesn't work like that.
If she does further time in prison, it will be in the women's prison, not the men's. As under Irish law, that's where the judge has to send her. If she remains in Limerick, they'll probably just transfer the building she's in back to the women's prison. She'd have been out in June this year.
There's been more "talk" about the loss of that building than there was about building it.
Five years for making threats to kill a person that the state is unable to prove is still in the country. But you're not bothered about that side of things. Just that it fits your narrative. The fact that he wasn't old enough* to apply to the court system, when the Gender Recognition Certificate was given also slips by you.
Given that you've said, more than once, that you're not interested in her, you do seem to be following her case fairly closely. That or someone else is feeding you titbits to keep you interested. But also against a court order on reporting on her case. It's the reason why her last eleven years aren't I'm the public domain. Just parts of it.
*Means someone else, in her case, the women in charge of the shelter applied for it.
classic33
Senior Member
Where did the piece in the following screenshot get said?
I've followed the link back but nothing like that shows.
Editing another post so that it suits you, says more about you than the person you're making it seem said it. If you can't get the proof, you'll invent it. Something you're quite quick at doing, when it suits.
AuroraSaab
Squire
TLDR means Too Long Didn't Read. The rest was a jokey summary of it to save you reading it. Nobody, except you of course, thought it was an actual quote so save your erroneous righteous indignation for another day.
monkers
Legendary Member
I'm not bothering going looking, besides which you seem to have saved me the trouble by doing so yourself. If I am in error and it was somebody else's post then I'll gladly apologise to both parties. That's one more difference between us.
monkers
Legendary Member
Each time we see female aggression, do we need to observe what she is wearing and report on it, or would that sexist?
Rusty Nails
Country Member
It was a procedural fault, many/most tribunal cases end that way. It was a long judgement, ad I admit to skim-reading a lot of it, but wasn't there some comment on the reasoning behind why procedures were not followed, which was not exactly favourable to the representatives of the Green Party.
I am not saying that the Green Party were wrong in what they wanted to do with Ali but the procedures are there to protect people from unfairness and companies from claims of unfairness. It was more than just getting the admin wrong, and more than just "that's all".
AuroraSaab
Squire
I didn't need to look. It wasn't me and it wasn't anybody else's post either. It was you casually making up stuff hoping people see it and the mud sticks. (Though if someone wants to have Shock! Horror! 'unattended piles of laundry' that's entirely their perogative anyway).
monkers
Legendary Member
At this point in time, I don't know if I am in error or not. I relied on memory, which given my age and circumstances are now impaired. Accordingly I offer my apology for the error. All other points I made stand.
Maybe you could follow the example and apologise for stating that I alone am responsible for ending a thread in the other place?
AuroraSaab
Squire
Hard pass on that.
classic33
Senior Member
Aware of what it means, what you meant it to be is the question.
Bit late editing a post to put it in an the end though. The original post had already been read by the time your post appeared. Just another example of you making things fit your storyline.
AuroraSaab
Squire
Jeez. I don't care if anybody read the original 500 word dissertation length post, Classic. By editing the quote I was simply expressing my opinion that it was the usual 'Nazis... something .... something...1930's' ramble that wasn't worth my time to respond to. Most people would grasp that.
monkers
Legendary Member
Maybe reflect on the fact that you frequently use the manufactured term 'Stonewall's Law' in place of advice from Stonewall, that trans women with a GRC are not men but women. The law does not make any pretence about biological sex, but it does say that trans women are female under the actual law and that in order to avoid discrimination against them, they are to be treated as female.
The court ruling do say that GC beliefs are protected, they do not give licence to discrimination. In fact the judges in these cases have been very clear to say that the ruling do not give that permission.
