Gender again. Sorry!

[AuroraSaab]

Now that you reading the outcomes of a 30 year mass sterilisation programme in Sweden, you are effectively blaming the victims and misrepresenting the data in order to do so.

In Sweden it was a requirement to be sterilised and to have had genital removal surgery in order to legally change sex. It wasn't done as part of the forced Swedish eugenics programme. I have nowhere blamed the victims, you simply resort to verbose histrionics at the drop of a hat.

I find men who say they are women who say they are lesbians equally amusing, seeing as they are neither. They seem the most pushy and entitled people of all.

 

[monkers]

In Sweden it was a requirement to be sterilised and to have had genital removal surgery in order to legally change sex.

Yeh, that's what I said.

It wasn't done as part of the forced Swedish eugenics programme. I have nowhere blamed the victims, you simply resort to verbose histrionics at the drop of a hat.

I think you'll find that you have. What do you call it when a state abuses citizens, then later apologises and pays compensation, and you carry on misrepresenting that data in a twisted attempt to portray trans women in the UK as all rapists and violent criminals.

Let's remind ourselves or your debunked rhetoric about dangerous trans women still being in women's prisons. It just wasn't true.

You are being further exposed Aurora as the twisted little liar that you are.

 

[icowden]

I've just received two screenshots from N and I'm crying. 🤣 She's just used the app which told her 91.3% certainty female. She put her make up on and it said 97.1% certainty female.

To be fair, those apps are just making broad brush guesses. It's the same as the ones that guess your age. They can be amusingly wrong and very simply coded - hence anyone putting makeup on will be characterised as more female in the prediction model.

 

[monkers]

I thought N wasn't born with testicles? Wouldn't that likely make her female?

You're talking bollocks again aren't you.

 

[Ian H]

But somewhat selectively to imply that she is spreading hatred and contempt for the trans community.

Which of these groups do you think are not deserving of hatred and contempt?

• People who want to curtail free speech and suppress opinion (similar to most totalitarian regimes and oppressive governments)
• People who think that women aren't deserving of protection and should be free to be attacked or raped
• People who think that women's health issues are less important than the opinion of a transwoman

When did you stop beating your wife?

 

[icowden]

I thought N wasn't born with testicles? Wouldn't that likely make her female?

No, not necessarily. It sets her in the category of "it's complicated" - which is one of the points that @monkers has made a few times around the potential non-binary nature of male and female.

I'm guessing that N may fall under Swyer's syndrome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_gonadal_dysgenesis

 

[icowden]

When did you stop beating your wife?

No idea what you are on about here.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Let's remind ourselves or your debunked rhetoric about dangerous trans women still being in women's prisons. It just wasn't true.

Because they got moved. Which is good news.

You are being further exposed Aurora as the twisted little liar that you are.

Histrionics are such a feature of your posting.
It must be exhausting being you.

 

[monkers]

No, not necessarily. It sets her in the category of "it's complicated" - which is one of the points that @monkers has made a few times around the potential non-binary nature of male and female.

I'm guessing that N may fall under Swyer's syndrome.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_gonadal_dysgenesis

Guess away, you'll still be wrong. That's the nature of these assumption. N posted about herself (very unusual). But usual for her, it was pretty damn clear - all you had to do was read it.

 

[AndyRM]

That's a free internet tool. The result will depend on the quality of the software. Regardless, lesbians are allowed to have web sites just for themselves where biological men are not welcome.

Why would you even want to access a site that wasn't aimed at you? There are plenty of lesbian sites that are open to transwomen. To get worked up about one that isn't seems a bit entitled.

Like Her? Which everyone's favourite d!ckhead Glinner signed up to so he could take screenshots of trans and non-binary people using it?

 

[monkers]

Histrionics are such a feature of your posting.
It must be exhausting being you.

You really do need a mirror in your house.

 

[monkers]

To be fair, those apps are just making broad brush guesses. It's the same as the ones that guess your age. They can be amusingly wrong and very simply coded - hence anyone putting makeup on will be characterised as more female in the prediction model.

You don't need to tell me, you need to tell Jenny Watson, though I think she might be in the picture now. 🤣







Jenny Watson
@dnalerinrehtron
·
Jun 2

This just dropped!
@LCommunityHQ
's first phase, our fully developed app, is the first lesbian app to use sex recognition software (99.85% accurate). It analyses bone structure, features, movement & heat emissions. Live on App & Google Play Store this month

Too funny.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Like Her? Which everyone's favourite d!ckhead Glinner signed up to so he could take screenshots of trans and non-binary people using it?

As I've said previously there's an element of body shaming in some of Glinner's Twitter output.

The Her app owners have decided to include transwomen as lesbians, which is fine - it's their app to do with as they wish - but it's not unreasonable that there is an app for those lesbians who don't wish to be matched/socialise with biological males. Being excluded in principle from such apps seems to get some men very worked up, even though there are plenty of inclusive apps available.

 

[monkers]

As I've said previously there's an element of body shaming in some of Glinner's Twitter output.

The Her app owners have decided to include transwomen as lesbians, which is fine - it's their app to do with as they wish - but it's not unreasonable that there is an app for those lesbians who don't wish to be matched/socialise with biological males. Being excluded in principle from such apps seems to get some men very worked up, even though there are plenty of inclusive apps available.

Irony really is a thing that you don't understand isn't it.

 

[monkers]

No idea what you are on about here.

It says you are asking leading or loaded questions.


View: https://youtu.be/G0ZZJXw4MTA