CXRAndy
Veteran
In lawbigotry
It's not bigotry to clearly state that person is a man or question why they are in female spaces
In lawbigotry
Why do you think they needed to be locked?...
Nobody's asking for your life history, just a brief word.
For me to state my disability means providing medical information. That you fail to understand how intrusive shows you really don't appreciate the nature of (some) disabilities and given how strongly you are arguing about protections for your our group, I am horrified.I think staff politely saying 'I'm afraid this seat/facility/space is for disabled people only' is acceptable. You saying, 'I know, I do have a disability, it's xxxxx, or I need the loo more often, or even it's an unseen one..' isn't that intrusive.
That time has passed, brought about by men claiming to be women invading women only spaces.The convention in this country is that you don't ask.
Yes you made repeated verbal attacks on me. This is what social media enables. We are told by site owners of social media to hide behind avatars. This protects site owners, but it also protects perpetrators, people like you who harass people on social media.
It is perfectly legitimate to insult people who harass, especially as their is no other available recourse.
And of course, your bigotry makes you blind to the reality. Lesbian women are being harassed on the basis of 'you MUST be trans'. Tall women are being harassed on the basis of 'you MUST be trans'. Women who have beaten records in sport are 'transvestigated' with photographs of them and smears expressed in vile cess pits like Mumsnet. Any cis woman who is trans supportive MUST be trans and having sex with their dog.
The harassment of cis women by cis men on the basis that being trans supportive means they MUST be trans, is beyond the pale, and farking ridiculous by obsessives like you. 'A piece of shoot' response is hardly going too far. Who the fark do you people think you are?
And just to remind other readers of the thread, I've been warning about these behaviours - men with obsessions using their faux arguments about protecting women and girls, and in the process harassing women and girls.
For me to state my disability means providing medical information. That you fail to understand how intrusive shows you really don't appreciate the nature of (some) disabilities and given how strongly you are arguing about protections for your our group, I am horrified.
That would be a serious matter in most companies and would be sexual harassment. I'm not sure how it is relevant to the current debate given that statistically women are more likely to face such harassment than men.Many of these types of argument seem to stem from failing to appreciate the challenges of others and thinking "me". eg (As I bloke) for 4+ months at one employer I had to endure a female member of staff visiting my office each morning and telling me all about her erotic dream involving me from last night (in explicit detail).
I have a radar key though never used it, as most toilets don't use them.I guess the radar key is solving your group's problem of people who aren't entitled to use those facilities having unwelcome access. You don't seem very supportive of women wanting to solve their similar problem though, which can't be resolved by giving us a key seeing as we are 50% of the population.
It is relevant in that is could indicate that statistics don't capture the full scope of some problems, that statistics can be massively influenced by readiness to report and that there are other groups not getting the attention they deserve.That would be a serious matter in most companies and would be sexual harassment. I'm not sure how it is relevant to the current debate given that statistically women are more likely to face such harassment than men.
Rapist's to re classified as men of those who claim/ed to be women
Things are moving fast for the benefit of women and girsl
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/18/trans-rapists-can-no-longer-claim-to-be-women/
Yes you made repeated verbal attacks on me. This is what social media enables. We are told by site owners of social media to hide behind avatars. This protects site owners, but it also protects perpetrators, people like you who harass people on social media.
It is perfectly legitimate to insult people who harass, especially as their is no other available recourse.
And of course, your bigotry makes you blind to the reality. Lesbian women are being harassed on the basis of 'you MUST be trans'. Tall women are being harassed on the basis of 'you MUST be trans'. Women who have beaten records in sport are 'transvestigated' with photographs of them and smears expressed in vile cess pits like Mumsnet. Any cis woman who is trans supportive MUST be trans and having sex with their dog.
The harassment of cis women by cis men on the basis that being trans supportive means they MUST be trans, is beyond the pale, and farking ridiculous by obsessives like you. 'A piece of shoot' response is hardly going too far. Who the fark do you people think you are?
And just to remind other readers of the thread, I've been warning about these behaviours - men with obsessions using their faux arguments about protecting women and girls, and in the process harassing women and girls.
Ive never attacked you. Have you confused me with someone else?