Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

CXRAndy

Veteran
That is really bizarre. Monkers you have blocked anyone with which you disagree on here, yet post about echo chambers.

What has happened is your ideology has been destroyed in light of the Supreme court decision.

I hope you come to respect that women have the right to be safe in mind and body in their chosen spaces.
 

CXRAndy

Veteran
Some saying shameful silence of Starmer. I'd say he pinned his flag on the wrong pole.

1000021385.jpg

And yes has NHS needs to immediately re instate women only wards all the other female specific care too
 
You now admit to TERFING on social media in other places...

Yes, Mickle, I bet you've been standing up for women's rights and acknowledging material reality all over the place. Tut tut.
The absolute arrogance of somebody as potty mouthed and abusive as this complaining about anybody, anywhere, expressing an opinion on a social media site is quite something.
 
Take it up with Steve. He introduced the disabled toilets solution. You just throw bs out without any evidence as usual.
You really believe that?
It's quite easy to check your own posting history. You were wrong when you introduced that argument into this thread, two years ago, and still wrong now.
The biggest thrower of bullshit on this thread is yourself. And that's counting the person who had his account deleted, then came back when things quietened down in the media.
Men have a right to single sex care too. You could have asked and they would have tried to accommodate you. That you can't see why a woman might object to intimate examination from a male, whereas most men are happy with female doctors and nurses, shows you really have no clue what the issues are.
A delay like that would have meant being placed at the back of a queue, over 18 months long. Whether I'd have had that time is another matter. As I said I put treatment of the condition ahead of anything else. I'd been told to get a bag ready, just in case the latest tests showed any signs of it spreading.
You have no idea what that is like, or you'd not be insisting that demands be made on who does the tests and examinations.

You saying that you can make demands of the health service shows that you have no understanding of the problems those working in it face everyday. You simply place your interests above those of everyone else, and care less.

The same on the disability side. You have said we shouldn't be using/be allowed to use the same facilities as a "normal person"(Yet to be defined by yourself.) like you. We should be kept away from the likes of "normal people like you.
 
The same on the disability side. You have said we shouldn't be using/be allowed to use the same facilities as a "normal person"(Yet to be defined by yourself.) like you. We should be kept away from the likes of "normal people like you.

This is a lie, Classic. You've said it several times but when asked to show where I've said it you never do.

Stevo did indeed reintroduce the disabled toilet thing, suggesting that people who did not wish to use toilets appropriate to their sex might use the disabled one. Page 1096, Sunday 11.36am. It's previously been discussed at length on and off throughout the thread but Stevo brought it up this time. For the millionth time though, it's not really about toilets.

I don't know why you post allegations that are easily checkable and proved wrong.
 
Last edited:

monkers

Squire
I see you are amused CXRAbsolutemoronicfarkwit.

This is your level too isn't it, attacking women on the internet to push your agenda of supposedly protecting women.

It's no longer unusual to find those men shouting the loudest about paedophiles are the perpetrators. They shout the loudest to provide a smokescreen to their own activities, dealing with their own mental difficulties.

In your case, I picture you in a grubby basement shouting at women on the internet on one screen while w*nking your pathetically tiny cock as you watch trans porn on another screen. That's just in between reading and believing conspiracies, spreading those and memes dementedly between you other little sessions. Pathetic intellectually stunted runt of a man.

Men like you are the very worst of humanity. In contrast there are very intelligent men on this forum who are absolute gentlemen - that's who the real men are - I don't need to name them.
 

CXRAndy

Veteran
I see you are amused CXRAbsolutemoronicfarkwit.

This is your level too isn't it, attacking women on the internet to push your agenda of supposedly protecting women.

It's no longer unusual to find those men shouting the loudest about paedophiles are the perpetrators. They shout the loudest to provide a smokescreen to their own activities, dealing with their own mental difficulties.

In your case, I picture you in a grubby basement shouting at women on the internet on one screen while w*nking your pathetically tiny cock as you watch trans porn on another screen. That's just in between reading and believing conspiracies, spreading those and memes dementedly between you other little sessions. Pathetic intellectually stunted runt of a man.

Men like you are the very worst of humanity. In contrast there are very intelligent men on this forum who are absolute gentlemen - that's who the real men are - I don't need to name them.

Diddums. I must have touched a nerve

This post is from the ' Be kind brigade '

:laugh:

Btw


You lost the war 😁
 
It's no longer unusual to find those men shouting the loudest about paedophiles are the perpetrators. They shout the loudest to provide a smokescreen to their own activities, dealing with their own mental difficulties.

Bit cheeky considering it's you who has had more epic meltdowns than a polar ice cap and were worried Kellie Jay Keen might ban porn.

Screenshot_20250418_174905_Chrome.jpg

Funny how some people support the women's rights that benefit men - like freedom to do porn or prostitution, contraception and abortion - but don't support the ones that only benefit women, like keeping men out of their spaces.
 
Last edited:

mickle

New Member
No confusion. I recognise you by avatar name and the eye avatar which is unchanged since. There is also the matter that your attitudes remain the same.

After having previously and before the start of that thread had early on identified as a lesbian woman; it just often pays to get it out of the way.

I saw posts from Shep who said I was unnatural and that he's fed up with people ramming their identities down his throat.

On what I shall just call 'the ugly thread' which was eventually stopped by mods, you told me that supporting trans rights was all the proof you needed to know that I MUST be trans. After being told you were incorrect, you persisted with this line.

What was lost on you is that likewise, to be supporting cis women's rights you MUST be a cis woman. Only I am not so stupid to make the same mistake and make that accusation.

But it is so typical of men who insist on mansplaining to women what their rights are and what it means to be a woman to use these tactics. You are so absolutist that in your bigotry that you think everyone must listen to you and agree with you, otherwise you will alter their identity to suit your narrative.

You now admit to TERFING on social media in other places, and at the same time that women are complaining about the treatment of the Glinner brigade who spend their time harassing cis women on the internet saying that if they support trans rights they must be fck*ing their dog.

It's laughable that a person like you can claim to be protecting women's rights by not listening to women, and harassing them when they tell you that you haven't got a clue about the lived experiences of women.

It's the everyday experience of women who don't agree with bigotry to be hounded off social media. That leaves the bigots to chant and rant at the world from their own echo chamber of hate ie Twitter or X of whatever that twat Musk calls it now.

My views are wholly informed by years and years of listening to women on the subject of transgenderism and its impact on women's rights. My partner and her sisters, my mother in law and her wife, the 1500 or so women in my circle of on-line friends and in recent years my two wonderful radfem daughters. Linda Bellos (who's stayed at our house), Julie Burchill, Janice Williams, Joanna Cherry, Madeleine Berns (RIP), Mary Mac, Julia Long, Venice Allan, Kelly Jay Keen, Sheila Jeffries.. to name but a few. All who ive met in person, whose books ive read and whose meetings I've attended. But yeah "mansplaining'.

I'm guessing their 'everyday experience' of womanhood doesn't count because *bigots*.
 
Top Bottom