Gender again. Sorry!

[AuroraSaab]

If you can pee against a wall in public in a crowd of hundreds, why can't you pee in the Gents?

Yesterday's demo was the perfect example of why most women don't want to share certain spaces with men. Aggressive, threatening, abusive to women who were peacefully counter protesting.

Just a normal pro trans demo ..... claiming a vulnerable, oppressed minority just want to quietly get on with their lives whilst publicly calling for the deaths of women who disagree with them.

It's quite funny how women are told how hateful their views are by people who want them to stick a knife in their eyes.

 

[AndyRM]

Having now watched the horrifying scenes Andy had linked to and seeing these despicable images, I'm convinced that the pro trans lobby has definitely taken control of everything and all of the agendas are warped beyond recognition.

Jeezo, I've seen more threatening behaviour at my daughter's soft play group.

Y'all need to fortify.

 

[AuroraSaab]

Jeezo, I've seen more threatening behaviour at my daughter's soft play group.

Y'all need to fortify.

You've called people out for misgendering because it's supposedly so hurtful, but now you're telling women to be chill about public calls to comit violence against them? If a woman carried a placard anywhere near as offensive as that we'd never hear the end of it on here.

Next line will be 'Just some young people getting over excited'.

 

[CXRAndy]

I meant your "most important vote" line...

Well yeah, the definition of woman would have been eroded if this nonsense had been allowed to continue

 

[monkers]

Having now watched the horrifying scenes Andy had linked to and seeing these despicable images, I'm convinced that the pro trans lobby has definitely taken control of everything and all of the agendas are warped beyond recognition.

Jeezo, I've seen more threatening behaviour at my daughter's soft play group.

Y'all need to fortify.

If you are talking about CXRAndy as I believe you might be, then you are referencing the man who dismissed attacks the residents of hotels, as being merely 'bin fires', and claims of incitement were dismissed with the wave of the hand. And of course as the incitement was carried out by a woman and not a man, Aurora judged that she should not face prison even though the sentencing council say otherwise.

I have N due home soon, so some interesting conversation is a certainty.

 

[CXRAndy]

I'm convinced that the pro trans lobby has definitely taken control of everything

Well they pretty much have. Woke, liberals in positions of influence backed by the likes of Stonewall have basically lied to vast numbers of staff mostly women that men were allowed in to their spaces.

Some organisations have began to implement the Supreme court judgement. Others will fight and it will need legal challenges to sort out this whole mess.

Here is an example which will be changed through either pressure or legal challenge


View: https://x.com/Rebeccasaysno/status/1913698355277947110?t=S2X1j1V_8LyQUxgyVa3g6g&s=19

 

[CXRAndy]

I have N due home soon, so some interesting conversation is a certainty

Their legal status has changed re accessing toilets, safe spaces, sports etc

 

[AuroraSaab]

No, I said 2 years was too long for a Tweet that was up for a matter of hours. I doubt you think the men calling for women's deaths should face similar punishment. It's you who has previously dismissed these types of placards as youthful exuberance.

Please spare us the sock puppet musings of your imaginary friend.

 

[monkers]

Hello everyone N here, and for those of you who may be new here, I am the niece of monkers mostly identified here as N.

I am myself a trans woman, and a legal practitioner. I am a very private person, and not 'out'. I live and work as a woman, which I have the right to enjoy.

I specialise in UK human rights. As a complication, I now neither reside or practise in the UK. It's a little complicated, I have a shared employment arrangement with a group of UK chambers and Strasberg.

The Supreme Court judgment has sent shock waves across not just the UK but across the member states of the Council of Europe.

Monkers has now informed you of her very poor state of health. I have taken leave from my employment and shall be at home now for the foreseeable future.

I arrived home a little early, only to find monkers in the bath. I'm taking the opportunity to use this open laptop to say that the so-called 'trans debate' has been a most volatile one.

As a preliminary opinion, the Supreme Court judgment is not far from my expectation. Naturally I have personal disappointment that I hope you will understand, and I shall not seek to deny.

Although not all of my thoughts are fully formed, I'm giving you the opportunity to raise questions that you think I might be able to answer. I will not be replying to personal questions, impolite remarks about monkers or myself, or impolite remarks about the broader trans community. I will engage in discussion with those people who have genuine questions from legal perspectives.

I won't be sitting at the laptop full-time to receive question. Sitting here I have only my knowledge and the same resources that you otherwise have yourselves. I tend to favour the language of the ordinary man and woman to 'legalese'.

I'm home primarily for monkers, not for discussion; that will need to be kept in mind.

 

[AndyRM]

You've called people out for misgendering because it's supposedly so hurtful, but now you're telling women to be chill about public calls to comit violence against them? If a woman carried a placard anywhere near as offensive as that we'd never hear the end of it on here.

Next line will be 'Just some young people getting over excited'.

View attachment 8008

Yeah, I have.

I've told trans people to chill the f*ck out too.

None of the hyperbole gets anyone anywhere.

 

[Stevo 666]

I suppose not.

Hopefully this will be some solace:

View attachment 7994

It did make me smile, but for a different reason 🙂
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/columni...thatcher-still-lives-rent-free-enemies-heads/

 

[Ian H]

You don't seem to object to anybody having one so presumably...

You do an awful lot of presuming what others think or believe.

 

[bobzmyunkle]

You do an awful lot of presuming what others think or believe.

Perhaps if you explained your position, instead of making your usual pompous, gnomic posts, the presumption would be unnecessary.

 

[monkers]

Perhaps if you explained your position, instead of making your usual pompous, gnomic posts, the presumption would be unnecessary.

My own observation is that Ian is a proper gentleman and sound. He believes in well-considered rational thought and the respectable position and principle of ''people minding their own funking business''. Sorry to embarrass you Ian, but sometimes things go beyond the pale.

 

[bobzmyunkle]

My own observation is that Ian is a proper gentleman and sound. He believes in well-considered rational thought and the respectable position and principle of ''people minding their own funking business''. Sorry to embarrass you Ian, but sometimes things go beyond the pale.

Never met him. I was commenting on his posts on the thread.