Yes but as far as i'm aware before the ruling, it was impossible to refuse transwomen as it would have been ''discrimatory''JK Rowling's point about transwomen accessing women's refuges is more relevant, but detailed checks can be carried out when admitting someone to a refuge.
Not impossible, but certainly more difficult.Yes but as far as i'm aware before the ruling, it was impossible to refuse transwomen as it would have been ''discrimatory''
Not impossible, but certainly more difficult.
Men created this problem, they should sort it out with a third unisex cottaging room/loos
Now, without fear of a discrimination claim,
No, you cannot enter unless you're are a biological female
😁
Women campaigned for decades for equal rights and safe spaces.
Ever been to one of those bra burning parties, what a spectacle
![]()
Andy, I know sometimes it's hard to tell the difference - but that only happened in your head.
I think you're a bit tired, maybe it's time for your meds and a nice, quiet sit down.![]()
Harry potter called me by my name
![]()
Then, Trump pivoted to his usual bigotry. Instead of talking about defense cooperation or global security, Trump bragged about how he uses transgender people as political pawns to rile up his base before elections — saying Republicans should “bring it up a week before the election” to win votes. In other words, he openly admitted he sees cruelty and manufactured culture war nonsense as a campaign strategy.
In a scoop so exclusive that only the Torygraph have bothered to publish it.Four labour nutjobs whining about the Supreme court judgement
Charlotte Nichols, Kate Osborne, Olivia Blake and Nadia Whittome