Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

CXRAndy

Guru
For those men who flagrantly ignore the women's single sex facilities. I expect they will in the very near future find FAFO attitude from the general public.

The tide has turned
 
Come on Brompton, up your game. Who's next for the 'you're all the same' argument? Blacks? Jews?

Come off it.

Being a Gender Critical Feminist is a choice.

Being Black or Jewish is not.

It's also apparent from their post that AS is absolutely as one with the cronies I mentioned.
 

monkers

Squire
For those men who flagrantly ignore the women's single sex facilities. I expect they will in the very near future find FAFO attitude from the general public.

The tide has turned

When primal instinct is replaced with the words 'common sense', this risks becomes the prevailing narrative and attitude. Gove's appeal to the masses about having had enough of experts was the expert expertly exploiting that theme. You were trolled very expertly by an expert.

It's Homer Simpson syndrome - intoxicate oneself, shout at clouds, pretend to be authentic.
 
Last edited:
It's also apparent from their post that AS is absolutely as one with the cronies I mentioned.

I'm certainly at one with their view that women's toilets are for women. Which means that you're of the view that women's toilets aren't for women.

If we're going down that road though here's one of your cronies:

GtzoJ58XoAAclYQ.jpeg


He was happy to assault a woman but funny how he left because he was scared of another man confronting him.
 
I'm certainly at one with their view that women's toilets are for women. Which means that you're of the view that women's toilets aren't for women.

If we're going down that road though here's one of your cronies:

View attachment 8726

He was happy to assault a woman but funny how he left because he was scared of another man confronting him.

My standpoint is perfectly simple; transwomen are women.

Introducing a dumb clusk who assaults people doesn't have any bearing on that.
 

monkers

Squire
Not in the eyes of the supreme court for the purposes of toilet/changing room facilities that say women/female on the door.

They are for females not TiMs

False flag operations are frequent in the places you hang out. There was no reliance in the evidence at the Supreme Court that trans women were punching women on the nose in women's toilets for the thrill of it. Why do you think that is?
 

monkers

Squire
I'm certainly at one with their view that women's toilets are for women. Which means that you're of the view that women's toilets aren't for women.

If we're going down that road though here's one of your cronies:

View attachment 8726

He was happy to assault a woman but funny how he left because he was scared of another man confronting him.

🔍 Why “r/MtF” is suspicious as a user name:​

  • “r/MtF” refers to a subreddit, not a username. It stands for Male-to-Female, a common label used in trans-related discussions.
  • On Reddit, usernames start with “u/” (e.g. u/TransGirlLily). Subreddits start with “r/” (e.g. r/MtF).
➡️ So if the screenshot shows “r/MtF” as the poster, it’s either:

  1. Falsely presenting the subreddit name as a user name, or
  2. A poorly constructed fake, where the fabricator doesn’t understand Reddit formatting well enough to make it believable.


In other words fails to meet the standard of proof to be meaningful.
 
Top Bottom