No doubt true.
Bit like the people of Gaza, or Iran I suppose.
Thinking (aloud) about what I'd be saying if I were Iran. starting I'd be requiring that the negotiations are between Iran and both US & Israel (ie not just US). I'd be requiring that given US/Israel's recent record of negotiations all military attacks on Iran immediately stop whilst negotiations are ongoing.
1st negotiation requirement from Iran is "How are you going to convince us neither US nor Israel will be attacking us again in the future.
2nd given the US and Israel's track record on failing to honour international agreements and international law, both US & Israel must accept that Iran is a sovereign state and must have the capability to defend itself should others fail to honour treaties and/or international law.
I can think of plenty more but can't see US and Israel agreeing to the above.
Iran must realise how strong their position actually is if only their control if the Strait and to me looks like that control and its impact on world economy is what's got Trūmp running scared.
I'm not so sure about that. Didn't the latest "excursion" begin while negotiations were on-going? 🤔Thinking (aloud) about what I'd be saying if I were Iran. starting I'd be requiring that the negotiations are between Iran and both US & Israel (ie not just US). I'd be requiring that given US/Israel's recent record of negotiations all military attacks on Iran immediately stop whilst negotiations are ongoing.
Hence my comment saying "... that given US/Israel's recent record of negotiations..." ie first sign of attack from Israel or US whilst negotiation ongoing and Iran launches massive attack on ... Iran effectively saying "after your behaviour just a few weeks ago nobody, us included will trust you so break this and we'll just go no-limits".I'm not so sure about that. Didn't the latest "excursion" begin while negotiations were on-going? 🤔Thinking (aloud) about what I'd be saying if I were Iran. starting I'd be requiring that the negotiations are between Iran and both US & Israel (ie not just US). I'd be requiring that given US/Israel's recent record of negotiations all military attacks on Iran immediately stop whilst negotiations are ongoing.
The representatives from Oman seemed to think so, along with Jonathan Powell the UK National Security Adviser.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...s-iran-talks-and-judged-deal-was-within-reach
Hence my comment saying "... that given US/Israel's recent record of negotiations..." ie first sign of attack from Israel or US whilst negotiation ongoing and Iran launches massive attack on ... Iran effectively saying "after your behaviour just a few weeks ago nobody, us included will trust you so break this and we'll just go no-limits".
I agree. I claim no expertise or experience of ending wars but everybody seems to be saying that these days all wars end through talking not fighting. Yet from Iran's perspective they were talking, compromising, etc. and then their opposite numbers started a war! What can they do?I do not see any point in entering negotiations, while I (forlornly) hope they work.