So we heard
@multitool incoherent ramblings about how the same ICJ he defended dare the talk bad about the UNRWA.. Well it turns out with good reason, just as there are good reasons for countries to stop the money flowing. Something you lot i'm sure would agree on if it was any other country then Isreal, and i don;t care about the denyism, it's a fooking pattern.
The full article with all accusations:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/28/world/middleeast/gaza-unrwa-hamas-israel.html or a mirror that doesn't need an login:
https://archive.is/u0hZ1#selection-7203.5-7207.32
So the employees that are fired are accused of participating in the atrocity from actively participating in a kibbutz where 97 people died, to supplying weapons, participating in kidnapping...(the farkers didn't turn their phones off so there is a clear track of their movements)
You have a farking Hamas fan to talk about this like it's some kind of conspiracy to cut funding to the UNRWA. A further rumor is that at least 10% has ties with militants Hamas or others.
They simply had not other choice it's also why there won't be peace as long as the UNRWA is around, you can't have an organization that supposed to be a ''peacekeeper'' and a participant in the unrest at the same time. So they need to find a better system without the UNRWA.. again a thing you would all rally against if a isreali version was suggested(so the same as UNRWA but run by Isreali's)(and no i don't think putting Isreali settlers in is a better system)
Yes results from running way from the negotiating table and choosing the path of war and suffering instead, but i guess that would be to much reflection on the Palestinian actions right? The UNRWA fuelled position of forever victims is so much better.. Why would countries like Egypt, Saudi and such not fall for that?
