Blazing Saddles
Active Member
And yet, despite all the shenanigans surrounding Greenland…
With binders of evidence, each sentence in those binders geared to be a nail in the coffin of the people who perverted democracy sitting right in front of her, she asked if there was “a smoking gun.”
I remember being shocked by the question.
A reduction of serious investigations and accusations and evidence being reduced to a soundbite by someone who was purported to be an intelligent person. Here was a respected British journalist, actively undermining and belittling someone to ensure that her job and her career and her reputation remained intact in the face of the scale of the accusations I was bringing to light. I remember noticing trepidation, awkwardness. I remember all of the journalists & producers at the BBC being scared - many have said it to me directly.
I came into that room expecting reasonable and rational discussion about what was sitting in front of all of us, only to be reduced to a young boy, getting too big for his boots, without a so-called “smoking gun”.
Jo had done her job just right. And the political establishment, BBC and conservative cesspit ran that clip over and over again: “no smoking gun.”
I didn’t have a smoking gun, they were right.
I had an entire farking bomb.
I'm baffled. How does Cleese fit in?
Note that the Israeli embassy is the one leading the complaints about the lack of coverage in the BBC. Just another fascist stick to beat the BBC with.
Note that the Israeli embassy is the one leading the complaints about the lack of coverage in the BBC. Just another fascist stick to beat the BBC with.
Maybe officially but on social media lots of Iranians are also complaining about the lack of coverage from all outlets, but especially the BBC. They aren't fascists. Unless you think they are all Zionist plants or something. The BBC were late to the party but it could just be that many outlets were slow to realise the size of the pushback this time and with no reporters in the country some were averse to using social media reports and footage of which they couldn't verify the date or location.
Maybe the question is whether they reported the news fully. However important events, I think the time allocated should not run beyond what there is to be reported. Nothing worse than happens sometimes on some news programs where much of the program is given to an important issue but one where there isn't a lot to actually report so you get endless repetition from all their different correspondents, often providing nothing useful. They to fill the time you start getting views from UK public stopped on the streets ...I watched BBC news at ten last night and it was disgusting that only the first five minutes or so were spent talking about Iran.
This is not what I pay my licence fee for.
Seems unlikely that they're all fascists. Maybe they're just desperate for the world to pay attention in the hope that it will help.
Maybe the question is whether they reported the news fully. However important events, I think the time allocated should not run beyond what there is to be reported. Nothing worse than happens sometimes on some news programs where much of the program is given to an important issue but one where there isn't a lot to actually report so you get endless repetition from all their different correspondents, often providing nothing useful. They to fill the time you start getting views from UK public stopped on the streets ...