Mike Amesbury MP

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

ebikeerwidnes

Senior Member
His appeal against sentence is due to be heard today at Chester Crown Court

Sentence has been changed to Suspended

also anger management course and some sort of alcohol monitoring

I reckon he will sleep easier tonight - but he will still be subject to a recall petition I think
and will be under a lot of pressure to resign anyway

It will be interesting to see how the votes go - especially for Reform
 

CXRAndy

Senior Member
He won't resign, until pushed out
 
If the constituent he decked had sent him an email saying 'I'd like to punch your face in, Amesbury', how long do you think he would have got?
 

CXRAndy

Senior Member
This is clear two tier justice. Everyone can see it. This is Yvette cooper just a couple of days ago

Saying labour are not tolerating violent thugs . That lasted a matter of hours.
 

icowden

Squire
This is clear two tier justice. Everyone can see it. This is Yvette cooper just a couple of days ago
Saying labour are not tolerating violent thugs . That lasted a matter of hours.
No it isn't. Sentencing is based on the crime and the likelihood of the person to reoffend. As much as there is a strong argument that Amesbury should do some time, there is little benefit to us wasting taxpayers money to keep him in a prison when it's cheaper to give him a curfew and an ankle tag. He still gets the criminal record, but he isn't a danger to the public.
 

CXRAndy

Senior Member
No it isn't. Sentencing is based on the crime and the likelihood of the person to reoffend. As much as there is a strong argument that Amesbury should do some time, there is little benefit to us wasting taxpayers money to keep him in a prison when it's cheaper to give him a curfew and an ankle tag. He still gets the criminal record, but he isn't a danger to the public.

Absolute cobblers, the judiciary has been politicised. The variability of sentences is a complete joke.

Attack a man in the street, repeatedly punch him. That is actual bodily harm. Suspended sentence, compared to some of those involved in the aftermath of the 3 girls murdered by a terrorist. Several years for making inflammatory comments.

The general public are not blind and can see the unfair, injustice, imbalance in sentences.
 

monkers

Squire
Absolute cobblers, the judiciary has been politicised. The variability of sentences is a complete joke.

Attack a man in the street, repeatedly punch him. That is actual bodily harm. Suspended sentence, compared to some of those involved in the aftermath of the 3 girls murdered by a terrorist. Several years for making inflammatory comments.

The general public are not blind and can see the unfair, injustice, imbalance in sentences.

Listen up Shithead. Harm is not determined by the number of punches, but by the extent of injury.

Parliament are the legislature. They decide what the law is.

The police report breeches of criminal law to the CPS.

The CPS decides which cases to prosecute and which to drop.

Magistrates in some courts or jurors in others determine culpability.

The independent Sentencing Council for England & Wales produce sentencing guidelines.

Magistrates or Judges determine mens rae where appropriate and apply the sentencing guidelines accordingly.

Any degree of politicisation is caused by the shortage of prison places caused by a right-wing government during so-called ''austerity'' a process involving selling off police stations, court buildings, and the prison estate to developers. And now we have a government that you consider to be ''lefties'' and ''woke'' are left with trying to fix the problems they inherited from shitheads like you who think that tax should only be paid by other people.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
No it isn't. Sentencing is based on the crime and the likelihood of the person to reoffend. As much as there is a strong argument that Amesbury should do some time, there is little benefit to us wasting taxpayers money to keep him in a prison when it's cheaper to give him a curfew and an ankle tag. He still gets the criminal record, but he isn't a danger to the public.

He was clearly a danger to at least one member of the Public.

Does the ankle tag prevent him throwing a punch then?, or, prevent him drinking alcohol to excess?
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Does a fine prevent you from speeding again?
(Sorry, that's a ridiculous argument).

Has Amesbury been caught speeding as well?

a) I suppose, it depends how big the fine is, relative to your income

b) maybe a fine is not an appropriate punishment for speeding, maybe we should have a life time driving ban and/or car crushed?
 
Top Bottom