theclaud
Reading around the chip
I've got some degree of sympathy for the Netherlands not wanting theirs back.
No Shamima Begum Thread?
- Thread starter spen666
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
I've got some degree of sympathy for the Netherlands not wanting theirs back.
D
Deleted member 121
Guest
The then foreign minister of Bangladesh Abdul Momen said that she would face the death penalty if she were to enter Bangladesh and they still do not even agree that she has citizenship so they would refuse any grounds she has of application anyway, despite what is said here.
OP
OP
spen666
Well-Known Member
I have given my answer to the question I replied to.
I refer you back to my earlier post.
Have a nice day
Ian H
Legendary Member
You appear afraid to acknowledge that there might be any moral dimension to law making.
OP
OP
spen666
Well-Known Member
I am not afraid to admit that. I have chosen not to be taken down a different debate and have chosen not to explain my thoughts on that. My discussion is simply about the fact the Home Secretary acted legally and correctly in making his decision. Not only do I say that, but so did the High Court, and now unanimously so did the Court of Appeal.
I have given my answer to the initial question and that is my contribution
Please do not make thinks up about what my views are in relation to morality and the law.
fozy tornip
At the controls of my private jet.
Great. Perhaps you could step away now?
Could anyone interested in spen's views around morality and the law take it up with him via private messaging?
OP
OP
spen666
Well-Known Member
Sorry you can't handle someone who doesn't provide the answers you approve of.
Knowing you want to try and silence me will only serve to encourage me to post more
BTW Who made you the censor on here? Or are you just trying to be a bully and silence people you do not agree with?
fozy tornip
At the controls of my private jet.
You don't 'provide the answers' to anything. What's to agree or disagree with in your ticker-taping legal outcomes already widely reported?
Ian H
Legendary Member
Last edited:
OP
OP
spen666
Well-Known Member
I provide the answers that I choose to provide. If they are not the answers you want, then that is your problem not mine. It does not give you any right to demand I do not post.
You seem to have a very controlling and bullying attitude and appear to be trying to silence people you do not agree with. Not the most democratic approach some would say
fozy tornip
At the controls of my private jet.
The quality of your posting gives everyone the right, the absolute right, the inalienable right in perpetuity, to beseech you not to post.
winjim
Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
The question as posed at the top of the thread was (my bold)
Is everyone in agreement that she deserved to lose her British Citizenship as she is a threat to National Security, and the Home Secretary and the 2 tribunals ( so far) are correct - or does no one care about the story?
so I think out of respect to the OP that's how we ought to be discussing the matter.
glasgowcyclist
Über Member
Your position on the legal outcome is clear. What do you feel about the deprivation order being applied, instead of bringing her back to the UK to stand trial for the terrorism crimes she is accused of?
After all, you started this thread as a potential ‘hot topic of debate’.
Rusty Nails
Country Member
Rusty Nails
Country Member
I think spen666 gave us an idea of what he thinks about that in his opening post.
