And yet their decision has made the UK population less safe, not more safe.
Which is better - to allow a claimed former terrorist in to the country so that you know *exactly* where they are at all times and what they are doing, and to be able to assess whether they have, as they say, reformed or:-
To tell that person to bugger off and send them straight back to the terrorist cell that they joined in a foreign country where you have no presence and limited intel, and where you have now incentivised them to attack the country that has rejected them?
So by that logic, should Isreal house all those Hamas terrorist they captured in houses amongst Jews? If not why do you think it's any better to let people who have been trained to hate everything western live amongst the things and persons they hate? We already have enough of those lunatics i say anyone we can stop getting in is progress.
Alltough the longer issue is far more complicated, and is just as any criticism on Isreal is often quickly called ''antisemitism'' similarly any criticism on Islam is often called islamophobia, however if we want to tackle extremism we have to put limits on what is freedom of expression and that's is proven to be hard, whter it is an certain book that is teached in schools or an movie that portrayed something not to certain muslims groups liking in the past years we have seen schools throwing teachers under the bus to appease the angry muslim crowd, and movie(s) screening being cancelled for the same reason. Which means we moving futher backwards, towards less freedom, towards more religious rules.
and as long as we keep on doing that we don't need to be surprised more people get indoctrinated.
