FishFright
Well-Known Member
Drive fewer lorries.
Lay more rail track , but not here or there or near me or ....
Drive fewer lorries.
There is already a shortage of between 60,000 and 80,000 truck drivers in Germany - and the number is rising. Every year around 30,000 drivers retire and only around 15,000 young people are replacing them. There is a worldwide need for drivers.
You figure intrigued me so I checked with the Tageschau, the BBC 1 news equivalent. One of the reasons for the shortage is the abolition of conscription which used to train drivers who would then go on to do this as a job afterward. Other factors include low pay and the cost to family life of being on the road.
The situation in the UK was also reported, and the reasons for the shortage attributed to Brexit and the barriers it has created, and also to covid. Freedom of movement has gone, and many from eastern Europe who went home due to covid are unlikely to want to return, not least because of the tiresome bureaucracy involved now, including at the border. The UK is not at attractive as it used to be and there is rising demand nearer to home.
My own take on this is that this is a European wide problem that is likely to get worse, and that Brexit has made it worse for the UK rather than being the sole cause of it.
In the end the market will solve this inasmuch as pay and conditions will have to improve dramatically, and we will all have to pay more for the privilege of having goods supplied. Train more lorry drivers and fewer accountants, solicitors and estate agents!
and I would be as noble as you.
Didn’t Johnson Get Brexit Done after all? I thought we had negotiated a fantastic deal already and we’re now free to pay the French to control our borders.Extricating ourselves from the hideously complicated mess that was EU membership was never going to be smooth and easy.
I am tickled by this post, for the contrasts within it.That's a high bar few of us can aspire to, although I agree with the thread title.
Extricating ourselves from the hideously complicated mess that was EU membership was never going to be smooth and easy.
It could have gone a great deal worse than it is going.
I also like the thread because it's only right there is a home for @Fab Foodie to post his daily Brexit is shite stories from the Guardian.
That's a high bar few of us can aspire to, although I agree with the thread title.
Extricating ourselves from the hideously complicated mess that was EU membership was never going to be smooth and easy.
It could have gone a great deal worse than it is going.
I also like the thread because it's only right there is a home for @Fab Foodie to post his daily Brexit is shite stories from the Guardian.
I am tickled by this post, for the contrasts within it.
Lines 1 and 4, snide digs at other posters, of the sort you, Pale Rider, are among the quickest to challenge when wielded by a leftie against a rightie.
Line 2, an admission of the reality rather than repeating all the lies about the easiest deal ever, oven ready, we'll have all the bargaining chips, etc - a really welcome retreat from polarised positions and not admitting any downside to Brexit and move towards constructive debate.
Line 3, a useful perspective to inject that we remainers should do well to recognise.
So why the flip do you have to spoil lines 2 and 3 by throwing in lines 1 and 4?
Disagreement is not insulting. I appreciate many of the subtle (and even not so subtle) jibes I read here whether giving or receiving. None of it is dependent on whether I “like” another person or even agree with them. Let’s not get carried away though. Witty puncturing is not the same as abuse, which is obviously wrong.insults are fine provided you don't like the person being insulted.
True that. She’s a force for good but still didn’t get her own dedicated thread.@mudsticks is one of the worthiest posters on here
Lay more rail track , but not here or there or near me or ....
True that. She’s a force for good but still didn’t get her own dedicated thread.
True that. She’s a force for good but still didn’t get her own dedicated thread.
Sensible?Can we lay off of the worthy .??
Ta
I understand the words but not how they relate to the conversation. Who here is a flawless hero? You? Mudsticks? And to whom? You? Me?Possibly because most people prefer their heroes to be flawed, or at least challenging.