Random Daily Banter

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I take your point but the photo needs something beside the truck for scale to emphasise that point.

This is a variation of it (Ford F250 Superduty)...

2017-ford-super-duty-pw-02.jpg
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Have you only just discovered those monstrosities?! Been around for a while. At least the ones used for their designed purpose make sense, but the "Platinum" edition is a joke.

No, seen them before, but both the ugliness and brutal front end (and lack of sightlines from the windscreen) were particularly stark from this perspective, I thought.

My petrolhead friend at least has the sense to prefer vintage cars which generally had a decent view of the road immediately in front of the car. It's hard to appreciate just how small his Lancia Appia is – but it's just wide enough for two normal-sized people to sit side by side.

ndclassic.com%2Fuploads%2Fcars%2Flancia%2F18521308.jpg
 

Pblakeney

Legendary Member
Bit harsh that as a comparison, but I get the point.

Like I said, these trucks make sense when they're used for what they're intended, but selling them for general trundling around is madness. Same with Land Rovers over here I guess, although I have seen a few F150s around recently.
I see an increasing amount. And all are status symbols which are never used for their intended use.
They are simply too large for our streets. Yes, I've seen a couple driving with wheels on the pavements either side of the road!
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I see an increasing amount. And all are status symbols which are never used for their intended use.
They are simply too large for our streets. Yes, I've seen a couple driving with wheels on the pavements either side of the road!

I did have a chuckle watching one going into a multi storey in town a few weeks ago, as the dangling height restriction sign scraped along the cab.
 

Pross

Über Member
Ran a 10k race this morning in a pretty mediocre (even for me) 49 minutes but I was properly cooked as I’m just unfit at the moment. However, when I uploaded it to Strava it gave me a new predicted 10k time of 47 minutes. What part of a 49 minute run at high HR makes it think I can run 2 minutes faster next time? At least it didn’t give me the dreaded ‘unproductive’.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Bit harsh that as a comparison, but I get the point.

Like I said, these trucks make sense when they're used for what they're intended, but selling them for general trundling around is madness. Same with Land Rovers over here I guess, although I have seen a few F150s around recently.

I think the fairer comparisons are between cars that even in 2000 were considered average-size cars and their modern equivalents - it does bring home how both taste and safety regulations have conspired to supersize our concept of what a 'normal-sized' car is.
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I think the fairer comparisons are between cars that even in 2000 were considered average-size cars and their modern equivalents - it does bring home how both taste and safety regulations have conspired to supersize our concept of what a 'normal-sized' car is.

Yup. The taste and safety regulations thing especially. Everyone seems to want a Qashqai or a Juke, but they're stuffed full of so much safety stuff that the interiors are tiny. Bizarre.
 
Top Bottom