Random Daily Banter

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I take your point but the photo needs something beside the truck for scale to emphasise that point.

This is a variation of it (Ford F250 Superduty)...

2017-ford-super-duty-pw-02.jpg
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Have you only just discovered those monstrosities?! Been around for a while. At least the ones used for their designed purpose make sense, but the "Platinum" edition is a joke.

No, seen them before, but both the ugliness and brutal front end (and lack of sightlines from the windscreen) were particularly stark from this perspective, I thought.

My petrolhead friend at least has the sense to prefer vintage cars which generally had a decent view of the road immediately in front of the car. It's hard to appreciate just how small his Lancia Appia is – but it's just wide enough for two normal-sized people to sit side by side.

ndclassic.com%2Fuploads%2Fcars%2Flancia%2F18521308.jpg
 

Pblakeney

Legendary Member
Bit harsh that as a comparison, but I get the point.

Like I said, these trucks make sense when they're used for what they're intended, but selling them for general trundling around is madness. Same with Land Rovers over here I guess, although I have seen a few F150s around recently.
I see an increasing amount. And all are status symbols which are never used for their intended use.
They are simply too large for our streets. Yes, I've seen a couple driving with wheels on the pavements either side of the road!
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I see an increasing amount. And all are status symbols which are never used for their intended use.
They are simply too large for our streets. Yes, I've seen a couple driving with wheels on the pavements either side of the road!

I did have a chuckle watching one going into a multi storey in town a few weeks ago, as the dangling height restriction sign scraped along the cab.
 

Pross

Über Member
Ran a 10k race this morning in a pretty mediocre (even for me) 49 minutes but I was properly cooked as I’m just unfit at the moment. However, when I uploaded it to Strava it gave me a new predicted 10k time of 47 minutes. What part of a 49 minute run at high HR makes it think I can run 2 minutes faster next time? At least it didn’t give me the dreaded ‘unproductive’.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Bit harsh that as a comparison, but I get the point.

Like I said, these trucks make sense when they're used for what they're intended, but selling them for general trundling around is madness. Same with Land Rovers over here I guess, although I have seen a few F150s around recently.

I think the fairer comparisons are between cars that even in 2000 were considered average-size cars and their modern equivalents - it does bring home how both taste and safety regulations have conspired to supersize our concept of what a 'normal-sized' car is.
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
I think the fairer comparisons are between cars that even in 2000 were considered average-size cars and their modern equivalents - it does bring home how both taste and safety regulations have conspired to supersize our concept of what a 'normal-sized' car is.

Yup. The taste and safety regulations thing especially. Everyone seems to want a Qashqai or a Juke, but they're stuffed full of so much safety stuff that the interiors are tiny. Bizarre.
 
OP
OP
briantrumpet

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Yup. The taste and safety regulations thing especially. Everyone seems to want a Qashqai or a Juke, but they're stuffed full of so much safety stuff that the interiors are tiny. Bizarre.

OTOH, one is more likely to have legs left after a crash than in one of these:

?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%2Fid%2FOIP.jpg
 
Top Bottom