Ok rephrased specially for you she would get away with crimes she has most likely committed but isn't charged for as of now.
it's was'nt in response to the statement made by the post before you.
thank for teh corection i dindn't remerber what it was exactly
If Both her parents have a Bangladesih passport it does matter, because it can mean she has a legal bangladeshi nationality and possible passport,(i say it like that because i don't known the specific laws on bangladishi nationality but for example if 2 dutch persons live in the uk and get a child the child would have a dutch nationality, regardless of any possible british nationality) which in turns means the UK could be correct in the legal sense to revoke her British passport
didn't stop her from traveling to Syria together with the other 2 girls who didn't make it back.
Well across europe despite an ever increasing list of powers intelligence agency's have we failed and we continue to fail because at large events we now place big brick blocks to prevent truck attacks, and still we are not fully protected against terror, so if we would be so much better off having her under already failing watch i don't really think so.
I will copy and paste an earlier response as it applies just as much to this: ''I think they all should be at the very least charged with the crimes they have done, that's why i advocated in this topic to have them charged and tried there. '' in contrary to what you seem to think i'm not a crime scene investigator, neither i'm i claiming that. However i also said and stand by it that i find it unconvincing that all those surviving Isis fighters/brides etc. would just be unarmed helpers/housewives etc. that doesn't add up. Yet that's the story they continuously claim. Yet last week they caught a former Isis something in the Netherlands
If it is my reference you are referring to, the reference was not relating to Ms Begum.
To late to quote them it would appear, but, the jist of it flows via posts #46, #48, #57, #59
How the hell should i known? I i'm just saying if your so closely into an terror organization, argument ally the worst terror organization the modern world has ever seen, it's simply unrealistic to claim you where just an housewife. Particularly since ISIS always was much harder on muslims coming from westerns countries because they had to ''proof'' themselves.
You seriously believe she could have joined isis and just did the washing up and such? Yet saw a few human heads laying around and tought ''oh just an infidel, this is fine'' then i don't known what more to say. i think it's an big missed opportunity that there isn't an international court organized after the fall of Isis to organize and make sure that those who remained are sentenced for what they have done. Now we have this mess
This is going to blow your mind but ISIS isn't very big on equal rights for women, tending to go for oppression, forced marriage, rape and absolute male control. But sure, I imagine they let the western women join in the terrorism with the men just "cos".
You're talking BS and you're repeating it in order to make it sound like you have a point, i have clarified multiple times now that it sounds very unlikely having read isis propaganda that proudly boasted their crimes, the isis youtube movies who did ditto and coverage on the spot from media like rudaw and other sources that is is very unlikely she was innocent.
As shown in the link above, there where ISIS women only battalion's with girls as young as 10 years old serving. So far for your narrative...
I admit it. You have completely undermined my narrative by contrasting a middle aged military trained American woman with a 15 year old British Schoolgirl. I'll even concede that she may have received some military training. She went to Syria in 2015. She has had 3 children in 7 years - presumably that's limited her involvement a little.
What the history of said women is isn't really that relevant, because your point was oppressively Isis men wouldn't allow women to fight. That is wrong
Again youre the one claiming there is no evidence, and claiming that she could have been just an housewive.. now you play it down by saying she might have hold an ak-47 and made bombvest? that sounds ridiculous.
How about making sure maximum effort is done to find out which crimes she has done and get her convicted for that first? Just like above US women?
