I always thought you were a supporter of due process given your working environment so where did that principle go now that we're talking about people seeking asylum? There is a process to be gone through where each asylum application is closely scrutinised by the Home Office and accepted or rejected and, currently, most applications are granted.
If there was any truth in your blanket and deliberate mis-categorisation of these people as all being economic migrants then the evidence doesn't support it.
Unless, of course, you're able to do what Patel can't and prove it.
Quite.
I do support due process, but I also support an appropriate due process.
Like many court battles, asylum seeking has now been reduced to tactics, how to win.
The rightness and wrongness of it are irrelevant.
Thus if someone is granted asylum, it merely tells us they won the tactical battle, it does not tell us they are a genuine asylum seeker although they could be.
Equally, if someone is refused asylum, it merely tells us they lost the tactical battle, it does not tell us they are not entitled to asylum, although it's likely they are not.
Several posters point to the high number of approvals, which tells us our system is not as hostile as some on here would have us believe.
If we were that nasty, there would be no approvals.
It also chimes in with the remarks of French minister about the UK being too welcoming.
Thus some economic migrants think: "Get yourself across the channel, because even if you don't qualify for asylum, there's a fighting chance you will get it anyway."