Starmer's vision quest

[Pblakeney]

I see that Starmer has briefed on the UK's position about the situation regarding Iran, Israel and the US.
I agree that the current administration is treating its population appallingly and that indiscriminate bombing must cease immediately.
Iran is no better either.

 

[icowden]

Completely avoiding answering the question.
Why 186 countries do not have nuclear weapons is open to conjecture and doesn't prove they are safer than those who have nuclear weapons.

Why 9 countries do have nuclear weapons is open to conjecture and doesn't prove that they are safer than those who do not have nuclear weapons.

You are simply highlighting the fact there is no evidence to support the greens claim.

You are simply being a pedantic dipshit who is annoyed that he isn't winning his point.

Given that we cannot know which is safer, the 186 without or 9 with, the majority would seem to be the key indicator.

 

[spen666]

Why 9 countries do have nuclear weapons is open to conjecture and doesn't prove that they are safer than those who do not have nuclear weapons.


You are simply being a pedantic dipshit who is annoyed that he isn't winning his point.

Given that we cannot know which is safer, the 186 without or 9 with, the majority would seem to be the key indicator.

The claim was made by the Greens that the countries without nuclear weapons were safer.

All I repeatedly asked is for the evidence to back up that claim.

You are now proving my point by stating there is no evidence.

The numbers either way are irrelevant


The fact you resort to personal insults for me asking for evidence to support a claim says more about you than anything else

 

[icowden]

The claim was made by the Greens that the countries without nuclear weapons were safer.

Yes

All I repeatedly asked is for the evidence to back up that claim.

I provided it.

You are now proving my point by stating there is no evidence.

No - you are refusing to accept my evidence.

The numbers either way are irrelevant

there are 195 places you can live. 184 of them don't have big explodey things that can destroy the entire country. 9 have explodey things that can destroy the entire country. Which would you say is safer? To have explodey things or not to have explodey things?

The fact you resort to personal insults for me asking for evidence to support a claim says more about you than anything else

No, it says a lot about you.