Starmer's vision quest

[icowden]

How many children are using their phone as a medical device though? If a small number have to bypass the ban then so be it, that will always be the case. If the vast majority lose access it will also reduce peer pressure on those who retain access for some legitimate reason.

Well for type 1 diabetes around 30,000 to 35,000. Then add to that any kids with heart rhythm disorders, hypertension, and some kids with hearing impairments.

The vast majority won't lose access, they'll just find a way around it.

 

[PurplePenguin]

I don't know how I feel about this social media "ban", but it will be interesting to see how it plays out. I was telling my 14yo son about it last night, and he just said he'll use a VPN! I guess you can set it to a country that doesn't have the ban, and will not be prompted to provide age verification on creating an account? Or maybe you can continue using one's own account? Anyway, what would be the consequences of knowing your son or daughter does that, technically you are complicit in them breaking the law? And who's going to know? It does seem like it will only capture a small percentage of kids who either don't know about VPNs or can't be bothered. The rest will carry on as normal

As I read it, your son would not be breaking the law, the social media company would be breaking the law by allowing a child to create an account; however, the legislation will no doubt incorporate a load of reasonableness tests such that the old child slipping through will be accepted.

Also, I'd be interested to know what your son would be sufficiently interested in using that he would want to use a VPN. Is it the need to talk to other kids who may no longer use social media or a desperate desire to be fed a tiktok algorithm?

 

[PurplePenguin]

One intriguing aspect of this discussion to me is that all the Android controls essentially require a Google account, so you have to choose between handing over even more data to Google, implementing some controls or paying for third party software.

I'm currently undecided.

 

[Pross]

Well for type 1 diabetes around 30,000 to 35,000. Then add to that any kids with heart rhythm disorders, hypertension, and some kids with hearing impairments.

The vast majority won't lose access, they'll just find a way around it.

So maybe 0.5 - 1%

 

[BoldonLad]

I don't know how I feel about this social media "ban", but it will be interesting to see how it plays out. I was telling my 14yo son about it last night, and he just said he'll use a VPN! I guess you can set it to a country that doesn't have the ban, and will not be prompted to provide age verification on creating an account? Or maybe you can continue using one's own account? Anyway, what would be the consequences of knowing your son or daughter does that, technically you are complicit in them breaking the law? And who's going to know? It does seem like it will only capture a small percentage of kids who either don't know about VPNs or can't be bothered. The rest will carry on as normal

It is not only the kids who will get around it, the parents have already started with the “my child is a special case” bleating.

 

[First Aspect]

One intriguing aspect of this discussion to me is that all the Android controls essentially require a Google account, so you have to choose between handing over even more data to Google, implementing some controls or paying for third party software.

I'm currently undecided.

Just create a gmail account you don't use for anything else. Then log off your browser when you want to use a VPN to watch porn. Hth.