AndyRM
Elder Goth
12 new nuclear submarines is not going to happen any time soon, we don't have the capacity to build them, nor, the money
No sh!t? That was kind of my point.
@Xipe Totec got it.
12 new nuclear submarines is not going to happen any time soon, we don't have the capacity to build them, nor, the money
In other news Poland has a new right wing president
Does seem that has not had a lot of 'air time' on here. I can hear the sound of heads being stuck in the sand now.
We've been having fun with Starmer's daily buffoonery.Can you? It's not like we didn't know the way things have been going or working out, but it is odd that the fans of the right wing seem to pop up after their victories.
No.So you don't think that there are any economic migrants coming over on boats?
The Albanians have dropped right down now due to work done with the Albanian government.For info, in 2022 the largest numbers of illegal migrants were originally from the war torn country Albania. And come to think of it, most illegal immigrants are coming directly from France, which is perfectly safe (apart from maybe Paris after the PSG win last weekend).
You wonder why, because the country is sick to the back teeth of mass immigration illegal and legalUnfortunately Starmer seems to think that winning votes by pretending to be reform lite is more important than looking after the country
You wonder why, because the country is sick to the back teeth of mass immigration illegal and legal
So are we just ignoring Starmer's plan for 12 new nuclear submarines, 6 new munitions factories and a massive investment in AI to defend our borders against dudes in small boats?
Or is that too little too late for y'all who are scared of them?
Strategic Defence Review at a time with so much happening (Ukraine, Middle East, Trump/NATO), is Starmer the only person in the world who was surprised they need more money spent on defence?12 new nuclear submarines is not going to happen any time soon, we don't have the capacity to build them, nor, the money
Strategic Defence Review at a time with so much happening (Ukraine, Middle East, Trump/NATO), is Starmer the only person in the world who was surprised they need more money spent on defence?
Lots of strong words, how keeping the UK safe is the main role of Government and Strategic Defence Review says to do that needs lots more money and suddenly ... it's an ambition, not a crucial role of Government to happen at some undefined point in the future to some undefined extent, maybe if Starmer's ambitions come to fruition.
Just like the Winter Fuel Allowance, at some undefined point they will make some undefined changes coming into effect at some undefined time covering unspecified pensioners ... but "can I have the credit now for whatever, whenever I end-up doing please?"
Ambitious man is Starmer, won't actually do or commit to anything, just have "ambitions" (unspecified decisions for unspecified actions at unspecified time applying to unspecified groups coming into effect on unspecified date)..
Ian