Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
If you rent it out to horsey people, you would get a hell of a lot more than that.

And the asking price would have been similarly elevated.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
If we want farmers to work for the public good, we should pay them to do that.

I didn’t actually say otherwise, but, that means subsidy (out of taxes) and/or dearer food, either way we are paying. Why not just put them on a business footing like any other business
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
A lot of these farms are multi generation. They are their homes as well.

Many many industries are/were subsidised.

Do you want to be reliant on foreign food imports?

God forbid there was a major global conflict and UK could not grow its own food.

A right wing commentator calling for subsidies? 😂
 
I didn’t actually say otherwise, but, that means subsidy (out of taxes) and/or dearer food, either way we are paying. Why not just put them on a business footing like any other business
About 40% of farming income is subsidised (on average). I'll just leave that out there for comments on how hard done by they are.
 
About 40% of farming income is subsidised (on average). I'll just leave that out there for comments on how hard done by they are.

How much of education is subsidised? Or healthcare?

This isn't whataboutery, rather illustrating that society makes choices about to what degree we hand over control of essential services to the free market, and to what degree we need to be able to guarantee access for everyone, and some degree of predictability.
 
Which means, to me, “farming” in it’s present form is not viable (on average).

Maybe it's not as it's structured, with massive power resting in the hands of supermarkets and consumers to make better or worse choices. I stuck Ukraine in here just as a counter example to richer EU nations and the US. (2023 figures from Our World In Data).

Sure, subsidies distort, but they give governments the power to set agricultural goals/outcomes they desire, whether they are skewed towards production or environmental goals.

1766593445107.png
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
How much of education is subsidised? Or healthcare?

This isn't whataboutery, rather illustrating that society makes choices about to what degree we hand over control of essential services to the free market, and to what degree we need to be able to guarantee access for everyone, and some degree of predictability.

I would suspect it is impossible to answer, in the case of Healthcare or Education. To the best of my knowledge, there is no DIRECT subsidy of Private Education or Private Healthcare, although there is undoubtedly some hidden subsidy in staff training if nothing else.

Farming is not a Government funded affair like NHS or Education. I suppose we could try Nationising Agriculture?, after all, Nationalisation is generally said to be a “good idea” isn’t it?, not sure it worked out too well in USSR, but, I am sure our esteemed Politicians could do a better job.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Maybe it's not as it's structured, with massive power resting in the hands of supermarkets and consumers to make better or worse choices. I stuck Ukraine in here just as a counter example to richer EU nations and the US. (2023 figures from Our World In Data).

Sure, subsidies distort, but they give governments the power to set agricultural goals/outcomes they desire, whether they are skewed towards production or environmental goals.

View attachment 11787

Don’t other industries have “consumers” and sales outlets (ie Supermarkets)?

I would agree that perhaps the structure of the industry needs to change, and, the various “power blocks” need to be “tamed” including the NFU and the big landowners (Duchy of Cornwall springs to mind, but, they are not alone).
 
Last edited:
I would suspect it is impossible to answer, in the case of Healthcare or Education. To the best of my knowledge, there is no DIRECT subsidy of Private Education or Private Healthcare, although there is undoubtedly some hidden subsidy in staff training if nothing else.

Farming is not a Government funded affair like NHS or Education. I suppose we could try Nationising Agriculture?, after all, Nationalisation is generally said to be a “good idea” isn’t it?, not sure it worked out too well in USSR, but, I am sure our esteemed Politicians could do a better job.

See how much money goes into the NHS, and NHS training, and there's your government support of healthcare. To be fair, if we look at the US model, you could argue forcefully that that subsidy actually reduces the average cost per treatment, but it's still taxes going into a business, albeit an essential one. Ditto state education. Both have been invented to supplant the purely private systems of the 19th century, but the government money means it controls the market through mahooosive funding streams. (And quite rightly so.)
 
Top Bottom