PurplePenguin
Well-Known Member
If you rent it out to horsey people, you would get a hell of a lot more than that.
This wasn't Surrey. Plus no stables, no water, poor quality grazing and poor access.
i did consider a side hustle in growing trees.
If you rent it out to horsey people, you would get a hell of a lot more than that.
If you rent it out to horsey people, you would get a hell of a lot more than that.
This wasn't Surrey. Plus no stables, no water, poor quality grazing and poor access.
i did consider a side hustle in growing trees.
Wind or solar farm?
This wasn't Surrey. Plus no stables, no water, poor quality grazing and poor access.
i did consider a side hustle in growing trees.
Your investment would mature in about 30 years. Unless you went into the Christmas tree market.
Actually all things considered, £95k sounds about £30k too much.
If we want farmers to work for the public good, we should pay them to do that.
A lot of these farms are multi generation. They are their homes as well.
Many many industries are/were subsidised.
Do you want to be reliant on foreign food imports?
God forbid there was a major global conflict and UK could not grow its own food.
About 40% of farming income is subsidised (on average). I'll just leave that out there for comments on how hard done by they are.I didn’t actually say otherwise, but, that means subsidy (out of taxes) and/or dearer food, either way we are paying. Why not just put them on a business footing like any other business
About 40% of farming income is subsidised (on average). I'll just leave that out there for comments on how hard done by they are.
About 40% of farming income is subsidised (on average). I'll just leave that out there for comments on how hard done by they are.
Which means, to me, “farming” in it’s present form is not viable (on average).
How much of education is subsidised? Or healthcare?
This isn't whataboutery, rather illustrating that society makes choices about to what degree we hand over control of essential services to the free market, and to what degree we need to be able to guarantee access for everyone, and some degree of predictability.
Maybe it's not as it's structured, with massive power resting in the hands of supermarkets and consumers to make better or worse choices. I stuck Ukraine in here just as a counter example to richer EU nations and the US. (2023 figures from Our World In Data).
Sure, subsidies distort, but they give governments the power to set agricultural goals/outcomes they desire, whether they are skewed towards production or environmental goals.
View attachment 11787
I would suspect it is impossible to answer, in the case of Healthcare or Education. To the best of my knowledge, there is no DIRECT subsidy of Private Education or Private Healthcare, although there is undoubtedly some hidden subsidy in staff training if nothing else.
Farming is not a Government funded affair like NHS or Education. I suppose we could try Nationising Agriculture?, after all, Nationalisation is generally said to be a “good idea” isn’t it?, not sure it worked out too well in USSR, but, I am sure our esteemed Politicians could do a better job.