Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

First Aspect

Active Member
It does sounds familiar to the one they were trashing just last year. I guess you have to give him credit for realising a deterrent to illegal immigration when he sees one.

Do you see any differences? Such as automatically declaring people ineligible for asylum if they don't arrive legally, whilst at the same time precluding legal entry to any of those people?
 

Stevo 666

Well-Known Member
Do you see any differences? Such as automatically declaring people ineligible for asylum if they don't arrive legally, whilst at the same time precluding legal entry to any of those people?

A few details maybe, but the idea of shipping illegal immigrants overseas does sound very much like something we've seen before. Possibly a good one for a leftie hypocrisy thread?
 

First Aspect

Active Member
A few details maybe, but the idea of shipping illegal immigrants overseas does sound very much like something we've seen before. Possibly a good one for a leftie hypocrisy thread?

In fairness, yes. I'm not terribly comfortable with it. Bit too much like sending recycling to Turkey.
 

Stevo 666

Well-Known Member
In fairness, yes. I'm not terribly comfortable with it. Bit too much like sending recycling to Turkey.

In the end I reckon that there is a groundswell of popular opinion on immigration that he has to do something about (or at least be seen to do something), otherwise we will likely be seeing a bloke called Nigel living in Downing Street in 2029.
 
I'm not going to answer that all point by point other than to say the Dutch research I linked to suggests GP's in the Netherlands aren't that confident in the system, whether it's confidence in dementia patients genuinely making an informed decision or confidence that relatives weren't swaying the decision.
Not entirely in 2016 or actually shortly there after as the euthnasia was in 2016 a docter/GP was procecuted for like the procecution/dutch CPS) said ''murdering'' and 74 year old lady. in 2020 the court/judge rules the GP was not guilty, the lady had made and declaration beforehand(when she was still able to) and to other doctors also agreed she was suffering, the procecution/dutch CPS) based their case ion the fact the ladyon the last moment wast talking incoherently and according to them the GP should have talked with her again. The court/judge agreed with the doctor, family and the two other doctors that it would have lead to extra stress and would have been pointless and agreed with the doctor that her earlier declaration was enough.
so with this in mind it's not that strange doctors are not to confident with dementia patients, it's also due to the whole nature of the condition.


Assisted dying for mental health reasons has gone up in the last ten years from 2 in 2010 to 219 in 2024 in the Netherlands. Could that be because as you say "Most mental health inflicted/motivated suicides are caused by the fact it takes such a goddamn long time to actually get the help needed"?
It could however we should also take into account that over the period you mention a lot has changed in term of social acceptance, discussion and the willingness for people to ask for help. So that clouds the numbers and than there also the law in euthnasia/asisted dying is only from 2002 so you could argue that in 2010 the law was quite new so that's an other reason why it wasn't used that much in 2010

Dutch guy. Have you actual evidence to back up your last statement.
You can indeed check the numbers and see how long the average waiting list is, both here in in the Netherlands, that the medication often subscribed for many different conditions can cause a higher sucide risk is also public knowledge so yes it's all in the numbers mate.
 

First Aspect

Active Member
In the end I reckon that there is a groundswell of popular opinion on immigration that he has to do something about (or at least be seen to do something), otherwise we will likely be seeing a bloke called Nigel living in Downing Street in 2029.
There is something in this. Hold our noses on a few things to avoid a British Trump?
 

AndyRM

Elder Goth
The pertinent question is about naked gardening really.

Charlie Dimmock pretty much showed the way for y'all red blooded males years ago on that front.
 

Stevo 666

Well-Known Member
There is something in this. Hold our noses on a few things to avoid a British Trump?

That is the reality that Starmer faces I think. Not sure if you read my link to the Danish approach to immigration, but the Danish PM claims that has limited the growth of the populist party/parties in the country.
 

Stevo 666

Well-Known Member
An article on the number of UK wealthy taxpayers in The Independent:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...naires-leave-non-dom-tax-labour-b2752227.html

A few quotes from the article:
"The UK has experienced its most significant drop in billionaires ever recorded, the Sunday Times Rich List 2025 has revealed. This year's list, which ranks Britain's wealthiest individuals and families, highlights a continuing downward trend in the billionaire population for the third year running.

While the Hinduja family retains the top spot with a fortune exceeding £35 billion, the overall number of billionaires has fallen to 156 from 165 in 2024. This decrease marks the steepest decline in the Rich List's 37-year history, coinciding with Labour's crackdown on the non-dom tax status."

“Our billionaire count is down and the combined wealth of those who feature in our research is falling,” said Robert Watts, compiler of the Rich List.

“We are also finding fewer of the world’s super rich are coming to live in the UK.”
 

First Aspect

Active Member
That is the reality that Starmer faces I think. Not sure if you read my link to the Danish approach to immigration, but the Danish PM claims that has limited the growth of the populist party/parties in the country.

We need to stop all of this civilized agreeing.
 

matticus

Guru
While the Hinduja family retains the top spot with a fortune exceeding £35 billion, the overall number of billionaires has fallen to 156 from 165 in 2024. This decrease marks the steepest decline in the Rich List's 37-year history, coinciding with Labour's crackdown on the non-dom tax status."

“Our billionaire count is down and the combined wealth of those who feature in our research is falling,” said Robert Watts, compiler of the Rich List.

“We are also finding fewer of the world’s super rich are coming to live in the UK.”

Can we move this to the Good News thread?
 
Top Bottom