Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Starmer does a speech to the nation.
Says a lot of words but ultimately, nothing.

He's no great orator, even if he does have a good speech to read. Macron does this kind of thing far, far better, both in French and in English, not that it makes him any more popular with his own electorate.
 

CXRAndy

Pharaoh
Starmer waffles, doesn't want, cant afford, scared of trade war with USA

Cooper falls asleep whilst the monotone Starmer blathers on

1000030411.jpg
 

Psamathe

Guru
I see from Starmer's press conference he's found his fence to sit on. Most commentators think poorly of his chosen fence.
A few excerpts:
Tough balancing act from Starmer today & don’t think he got it quite right.

He believes, he says, that Trump will be amenable to reason, though - as I said in my question to him - all evidence suggests otherwise.

The problem here is that Starmer couches his outlook & actions in the language of values... when President Trump speaks solely in the language of interests.

Brave words from @Keir_Starmer when the evidence so far suggests exactly the opposite

Starmer’s speech confirms what I speculated here: that Britain will be weakest link in Europe’s attempts to stand up to Trump over Greenland
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2026/jan/19/keir-starmer-greenland-tariffs-donald-trump-uk-politics-latest-news-updates?filterKeyEvents=false&page=with:block-696e0d908f08fe8c0be1bbb0#block-696e0d908f08fe8c0be1bbb0
 

Pross

Über Member

There was something on the news last night that the Europeans feel he knows how to deal with Trump and that they are keen for him to do the negotiating. Of course, that could just be because they want to keep at least a bargepoles length from Trump themselves and Starmer is an enthusiastic patsy for them.
 

secretsqirrel

Senior Member
 
I do slightly despair at people's inability to read between lines of carefully chosen diplomatic/lawyerly words and phrases which are aimed at various targets who will infer different things. Especially when we can be 100% certain that there's lots of stuff that's being relayed by diplomatic channels out of earshot of the media or public.

The easy thing would be to blow the whole thing up in a collective fit of pique, with stuff that would temporarily satisfy an understandable desire to say just what you're thinking in response to a power-crazed senile madman with the capacity to blow up the world (quite literally), but leaving doors open and bridges unburned is what I'd prefer serious and sane leaders to do. Let's not start a world war or a global recession quite yet.
 
I do slightly despair at people's inability to read between lines of carefully chosen diplomatic/lawyerly words and phrases which are aimed at various targets who will infer different things. Especially when we can be 100% certain that there's lots of stuff that's being relayed by diplomatic channels out of earshot of the media or public.

The easy thing would be to blow the whole thing up in a collective fit of pique, with stuff that would temporarily satisfy an understandable desire to say just what you're thinking in response to a power-crazed senile madman with the capacity to blow up the world (quite literally), but leaving doors open and bridges unburned is what I'd prefer serious and sane leaders to do. Let's not start a world war or a global recession quite yet.

I think that you are 100% correct.
However, you have to take into account who he is delivering the message to. By that I mean Donnie and Project 2025. Subtle won't cut it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
Top Bottom