CXRAndy
Epic Member
Do we actually have to go through the whole 'cutting off of our nose' bit again, like Brexit, before we accept that immigration is not only essential but actually has a large economic benefit?
View attachment 12858
Only to gdp.
Do we actually have to go through the whole 'cutting off of our nose' bit again, like Brexit, before we accept that immigration is not only essential but actually has a large economic benefit?
View attachment 12858
Do we actually have to go through the whole 'cutting off of our nose' bit again, like Brexit, before we accept that immigration is not only essential but actually has a large economic benefit?
View attachment 12858
It was undoubtedly a political appointment probably based on Mandelson knowing how to handle Trump with the Epstein connection a known. But the depth of the sleaze would not have been known at the time.
If 6 million are better off on benefits* there's something very wrong with the relationship between earnings and living costs.
*Spoiler; they're not.
Bigger population, bigger GDP. The focus should be GDP per capita.
Whereas...The focus needs to be on equitable distribution of that GDP.
Former Irish Taoiseach Bertie Arhen, no stranger to scandal, always said of politics 'it's the little things that trip you up'
This Mandleson thing has the hallmarks of just such a little thing.
It's not out of the question McSweeney will have to go as a firewall.
The focus needs to be on equitable distribution of that GDP.