CXRAndy
Epic Member
186 countries don't feel the need for them.
Most would possibly like to have them, but are prohibitively expensive
186 countries don't feel the need for them.
186 countries don't feel the need for them.
He just can't accept it's his failings that created the result. He has to blame others. Not his fault it's disreputable Greens campaigning unfairly.Keir Starmer has written to all Labour MPs attacking the Green Party for embracing "divisive" and "sectarian" politics.
186 countries don't feel the need for them.
186 countries don't feel the need for them.
He just can't accept it's his failings that created the result. He has to blame others. Not his fault it's disreputable Greens campaigning unfairly.
Maybe we now know why he gets on so well with Trùmp, two peas in a pod, neither living in this reality, both believing in their own egos.
Starmer certainly "not for changing" 'cos it's the rest of the world that's wrong not him,
Given the number of countries that would like to develop nuclear weapons, this is more nonsense from you.
The fact that 186 countries can't be arsed to develop them.The question is what evidence is there to back up the Greens claim that countries without nuclear weapons are safer than those who have them?